Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss

Junwen Mao, Kelly Jo Koch, Karen A Doherty, Laurel H. Carney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Sπ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-521
Number of pages15
JournalJARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 3 2015

Fingerprint

Hearing Loss
Cues
Noise
Hearing

Keywords

  • masked detection
  • sensorineural hearing loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss. / Mao, Junwen; Koch, Kelly Jo; Doherty, Karen A; Carney, Laurel H.

In: JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 03.08.2015, p. 507-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{769ac615e665456e9af0289d080ae378,
title = "Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss",
abstract = "Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Sπ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.",
keywords = "masked detection, sensorineural hearing loss",
author = "Junwen Mao and Koch, {Kelly Jo} and Doherty, {Karen A} and Carney, {Laurel H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "507--521",
journal = "JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology",
issn = "1525-3961",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss

AU - Mao, Junwen

AU - Koch, Kelly Jo

AU - Doherty, Karen A

AU - Carney, Laurel H.

PY - 2015/8/3

Y1 - 2015/8/3

N2 - Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Sπ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.

AB - Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Sπ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.

KW - masked detection

KW - sensorineural hearing loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934438636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934438636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8

DO - 10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 507

EP - 521

JO - JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

JF - JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

SN - 1525-3961

IS - 4

ER -