TY - JOUR
T1 - Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile
AU - Watson, E. B.
AU - Wark, D. A.
AU - Thomas, J. B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements A great many people helped to make this work possible. The following individuals graciously provided the samples reported on in this study: E. Baxter (Stillup Tal), M. Hamilton (Skaergaard), B. McDonough, B. Nash, R. Rudnick, S. Sorensen, F. Spear and L. Storm. The following individuals also generously complied with our requests for zircons and rock samples: J. Hanchar, A. Irving, D. Lindsey, R. Kerrich, D. London, G. Pearson, T. Pettke, M. Picard (Canadian Museum of Nature), and D. Rumble. In the end, zircons and rutiles in most of these latter samples were not analyzed because the rocks did not meet the criteria required for inclusion in thermometer calibrations: namely, independently constrained temperature, known or calculable activities of relevant components, and reasonable evidence for lack of inheritance in analyzable portions of the zircons. The analytical aspects of the project were expedited immeasurably by Graham Layne (IMP protocols for Ti in zircons) and also by Lara Storm and Frank Spear, who allowed us to use their unpublished data on Zr in natural rutiles (ADK and SF, respectively). During the course of the project, we benefited from extensive discussions with Daniele Cherniak, Mark Harrison, Joe Pyle, Frank Spear, Lara Storm and Dustin Trail. Helen Tomkins (née Degeling) generously provided access to her unpublished data and contributed significantly to our thinking about the effect of pressure on the Zr-in-rutile thermometer. The manuscript was improved significantly by the critical reviews of Thomas Zack and an anonymous reviewer. This work was supported by the Earth Sciences Division of the National Science Foundation, through grants EAR 0073752 and EAR 0440228 to EBW.
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - Zircon and rutile are common accessory minerals whose essential structural constituents, Zr, Ti, and Si can replace one another to a limited extent. Here we present the combined results of high pressure-temperature experiments and analyses of natural zircons and rutile crystals that reveal systematic changes with temperature in the uptake of Ti in zircon and Zr in rutile. Detailed calibrations of the temperature dependencies are presented as two geothermometers - Ti content of zircon and Zr content of rutile-that may find wide application in crustal petrology. Synthetic zircons were crystallized in the presence of rutile at 1-2 GPa and 1,025-1,450 °C from both silicate melts and hydrothermal solutions, and the resulting crystals were analyzed for Ti by electron microprobe (EMP). To augment and extend the experimental results, zircons hosted by five natural rocks of well-constrained but diverse origin (0.7-3 GPa; 580-1,070 °C) were analyzed for Ti, in most cases by ion microprobe (IMP). The combined experimental and natural results define a log-linear dependence of equilibrium Ti content (expressed in ppm by weight) upon reciprocal temperature: log(Tizircon) = (6.01±0.03) - 5080 ± 30/T (K). In a strategy similar to that used for zircon, rutile crystals were grown in the presence of zircon and quartz (or hydrous silicic melt) at 1-1.4 GPa and 675-1,450 °C and analyzed for Zr by EMP. The experimental results were complemented by EMP analyses of rutile grains from six natural rocks of diverse origin spanning 0.35-3 GPa and 470-1,070 °C. The concentration of Zr (ppm by weight) in the synthetic and natural rutiles also varies in log-linear fashion with T-1: log (Zrrutile) = (7.36±0.10) - 4470 ± 120/T(K). The zircon and rutile calibrations are consistent with one another across both the synthetic and natural samples, and are relatively insensitive to changes in pressure, particularly in the case of Ti in zircon. Applied to natural zircons and rutiles of unknown provenance and/or growth conditions, the thermometers have the potential to return temperatures with an estimated uncertainty of ±10 ° or better in the case of zircon and or better in the case of rutile over most of the temperature range of interest (∼400-1,000 °C). Estimates of relative temperature or changes in temperature (e.g., from zoning profiles in a single mineral grain) made with these thermometers are subject to analytical uncertainty only, which can be better than ±5° depending on Ti or Zr concentration (i.e., temperature), and also upon the analytical instrument (e.g., IMP or EMP) and operating conditions.
AB - Zircon and rutile are common accessory minerals whose essential structural constituents, Zr, Ti, and Si can replace one another to a limited extent. Here we present the combined results of high pressure-temperature experiments and analyses of natural zircons and rutile crystals that reveal systematic changes with temperature in the uptake of Ti in zircon and Zr in rutile. Detailed calibrations of the temperature dependencies are presented as two geothermometers - Ti content of zircon and Zr content of rutile-that may find wide application in crustal petrology. Synthetic zircons were crystallized in the presence of rutile at 1-2 GPa and 1,025-1,450 °C from both silicate melts and hydrothermal solutions, and the resulting crystals were analyzed for Ti by electron microprobe (EMP). To augment and extend the experimental results, zircons hosted by five natural rocks of well-constrained but diverse origin (0.7-3 GPa; 580-1,070 °C) were analyzed for Ti, in most cases by ion microprobe (IMP). The combined experimental and natural results define a log-linear dependence of equilibrium Ti content (expressed in ppm by weight) upon reciprocal temperature: log(Tizircon) = (6.01±0.03) - 5080 ± 30/T (K). In a strategy similar to that used for zircon, rutile crystals were grown in the presence of zircon and quartz (or hydrous silicic melt) at 1-1.4 GPa and 675-1,450 °C and analyzed for Zr by EMP. The experimental results were complemented by EMP analyses of rutile grains from six natural rocks of diverse origin spanning 0.35-3 GPa and 470-1,070 °C. The concentration of Zr (ppm by weight) in the synthetic and natural rutiles also varies in log-linear fashion with T-1: log (Zrrutile) = (7.36±0.10) - 4470 ± 120/T(K). The zircon and rutile calibrations are consistent with one another across both the synthetic and natural samples, and are relatively insensitive to changes in pressure, particularly in the case of Ti in zircon. Applied to natural zircons and rutiles of unknown provenance and/or growth conditions, the thermometers have the potential to return temperatures with an estimated uncertainty of ±10 ° or better in the case of zircon and or better in the case of rutile over most of the temperature range of interest (∼400-1,000 °C). Estimates of relative temperature or changes in temperature (e.g., from zoning profiles in a single mineral grain) made with these thermometers are subject to analytical uncertainty only, which can be better than ±5° depending on Ti or Zr concentration (i.e., temperature), and also upon the analytical instrument (e.g., IMP or EMP) and operating conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645035223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645035223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00410-006-0068-5
DO - 10.1007/s00410-006-0068-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33645035223
SN - 0010-7999
VL - 151
SP - 413
EP - 433
JO - Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
JF - Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
IS - 4
ER -