TY - JOUR
T1 - Crystal surface integrity and diffusion measurements on Earth and planetary materials
AU - Watson, E. B.
AU - Cherniak, D. J.
AU - Thomas, J. B.
AU - Hanchar, J. M.
AU - Wirth, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NSF grant Nos. EAR-0738843 and EAR-0948204 to EBW and an NSERC Discovery grant ( RGPIN-2015-04649 ) to JMH. We thank the following individuals for expert assistance with instrument operation and various aspects of sample preparation for electron microscopy: M. David Frey of the MNCR at RPI for assistance with FIB/FE-SEM characterization; Glenn Piercey at Memorial University of Newfoundland for help with the gold coating prior to the TEM foil preparation, and Anja Scheiber for assistance with the FIB TEM foil preparation at the German Research Centre GFZ, Potsdam.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/9/15
Y1 - 2016/9/15
N2 - Characterization of diffusion behavior in minerals is key to providing quantitative constraints on the ages and thermal histories of Earth and planetary materials. Laboratory experiments are a vital source of the needed diffusion measurements, but these can pose challenges because the length scales of diffusion achievable in a laboratory time are commonly less than 1 μm. An effective strategy for dealing with this challenge is to conduct experiments involving inward diffusion of the element of interest from a surface source, followed by quantification of the resulting diffusive-uptake profile using a high-resolution depth-profiling technique such as Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), nuclear reaction analysis (NRA), or ion microprobe (SIMS). The value of data from such experiments is crucially dependent on the assumption that diffusion in the near-surface of the sample is representative of diffusion in the bulk material. Historical arguments suggest that the very process of preparing a polished surface for diffusion studies introduces defects—in the form of dislocations and cracks—in the outermost micrometer of the sample that make this region fundamentally different from the bulk crystal in terms of its diffusion properties. Extensive indirect evidence suggests that, in fact, the near-surface region of carefully prepared samples is no different from the bulk crystal in terms of its diffusion properties. A direct confirmation of this conclusion is nevertheless clearly important. Here we use transmission electron microscopy to confirm that the near-surface regions of olivine, quartz and feldspar crystals prepared using careful polishing protocols contain no features that could plausibly affect diffusion. This finding does not preclude damage to the mineral structure from other techniques used in diffusion studies (e.g., ion implantation), but even in this case the role of possible structural damage can be objectively assessed and controlled. While all evidence points to the reliability of diffusivities obtained from in-diffusion experiments, we do not recommend experiments of this type using a powder source as a means of obtaining diffusant solubility or partitioning information for the mineral of interest.
AB - Characterization of diffusion behavior in minerals is key to providing quantitative constraints on the ages and thermal histories of Earth and planetary materials. Laboratory experiments are a vital source of the needed diffusion measurements, but these can pose challenges because the length scales of diffusion achievable in a laboratory time are commonly less than 1 μm. An effective strategy for dealing with this challenge is to conduct experiments involving inward diffusion of the element of interest from a surface source, followed by quantification of the resulting diffusive-uptake profile using a high-resolution depth-profiling technique such as Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), nuclear reaction analysis (NRA), or ion microprobe (SIMS). The value of data from such experiments is crucially dependent on the assumption that diffusion in the near-surface of the sample is representative of diffusion in the bulk material. Historical arguments suggest that the very process of preparing a polished surface for diffusion studies introduces defects—in the form of dislocations and cracks—in the outermost micrometer of the sample that make this region fundamentally different from the bulk crystal in terms of its diffusion properties. Extensive indirect evidence suggests that, in fact, the near-surface region of carefully prepared samples is no different from the bulk crystal in terms of its diffusion properties. A direct confirmation of this conclusion is nevertheless clearly important. Here we use transmission electron microscopy to confirm that the near-surface regions of olivine, quartz and feldspar crystals prepared using careful polishing protocols contain no features that could plausibly affect diffusion. This finding does not preclude damage to the mineral structure from other techniques used in diffusion studies (e.g., ion implantation), but even in this case the role of possible structural damage can be objectively assessed and controlled. While all evidence points to the reliability of diffusivities obtained from in-diffusion experiments, we do not recommend experiments of this type using a powder source as a means of obtaining diffusant solubility or partitioning information for the mineral of interest.
KW - Rutherford backscattering
KW - crystal surfaces
KW - depth profiling
KW - diffusion measurements
KW - ion microprobe
KW - nuclear reaction analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978159471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978159471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.06.043
DO - 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.06.043
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84978159471
SN - 0012-821X
VL - 450
SP - 346
EP - 354
JO - Earth and Planetary Sciences Letters
JF - Earth and Planetary Sciences Letters
ER -