TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - An analysis of costs and health co-benefits for a U.S. power plant carbon standard
AU - Buonocore, Jonathan J.
AU - Lambert, Kathleen F.
AU - Burtraw, Dallas
AU - Sekar, Samantha
AU - Driscoll, Charles T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Buonocore et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - There are numerical errors in the first two sentences of the "Policy Implications" heading under the Results and Discussion section. The correct sentences are: We found that for a moderately stringent, highly flexible policy scenario similar to the final U.S. Clean Power Plan, the monetized value of health co-benefits alone exceed estimated costs for the U.S. by $12 billion per year in 2020. When the social cost of carbon is included, the benefits increase from $29 billion to $50 billion with national net benefits of $33 billion per year in 2020.
AB - There are numerical errors in the first two sentences of the "Policy Implications" heading under the Results and Discussion section. The correct sentences are: We found that for a moderately stringent, highly flexible policy scenario similar to the final U.S. Clean Power Plan, the monetized value of health co-benefits alone exceed estimated costs for the U.S. by $12 billion per year in 2020. When the social cost of carbon is included, the benefits increase from $29 billion to $50 billion with national net benefits of $33 billion per year in 2020.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978975917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978975917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0158792
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0158792
M3 - Comment/Debate/Erratum
AN - SCOPUS:84978975917
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 11
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 6
M1 - e0158792
ER -