Contextual variability in free recall

Lynn Lohnas, Sean M. Polyn, Michael J. Kahana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to contextual-variability theory, experiences encoded at different times tend to be associated with different contextual states. The gradual evolution of context implies that spaced items will be associated with more distinct contextual states, and thus have more unique retrieval cues, than items presented in proximity. Ross and Landauer (1978) tested this theory by examining whether the probability of recalling at least one of two studied items should increase as a function of the items' spacing. Their failure to observe this result was taken as strong evidence against contextual-variability theory. We replicated their analysis on six recall datasets. For all of these datasets we found the pattern of results predicted by contextual-variability theory. These findings provide critical support for contextual-variability theories of episodic memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-255
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Data storage equipment
Episodic Memory
Cues
Datasets
Contextual
Free Recall
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • Context
  • Free recall
  • Spacing effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Contextual variability in free recall. / Lohnas, Lynn; Polyn, Sean M.; Kahana, Michael J.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 64, No. 3, 01.04.2011, p. 249-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lohnas, Lynn ; Polyn, Sean M. ; Kahana, Michael J. / Contextual variability in free recall. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2011 ; Vol. 64, No. 3. pp. 249-255.
@article{f970d4c950a44312b60a70e8d29a83ee,
title = "Contextual variability in free recall",
abstract = "According to contextual-variability theory, experiences encoded at different times tend to be associated with different contextual states. The gradual evolution of context implies that spaced items will be associated with more distinct contextual states, and thus have more unique retrieval cues, than items presented in proximity. Ross and Landauer (1978) tested this theory by examining whether the probability of recalling at least one of two studied items should increase as a function of the items' spacing. Their failure to observe this result was taken as strong evidence against contextual-variability theory. We replicated their analysis on six recall datasets. For all of these datasets we found the pattern of results predicted by contextual-variability theory. These findings provide critical support for contextual-variability theories of episodic memory.",
keywords = "Context, Free recall, Spacing effect",
author = "Lynn Lohnas and Polyn, {Sean M.} and Kahana, {Michael J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "249--255",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextual variability in free recall

AU - Lohnas, Lynn

AU - Polyn, Sean M.

AU - Kahana, Michael J.

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - According to contextual-variability theory, experiences encoded at different times tend to be associated with different contextual states. The gradual evolution of context implies that spaced items will be associated with more distinct contextual states, and thus have more unique retrieval cues, than items presented in proximity. Ross and Landauer (1978) tested this theory by examining whether the probability of recalling at least one of two studied items should increase as a function of the items' spacing. Their failure to observe this result was taken as strong evidence against contextual-variability theory. We replicated their analysis on six recall datasets. For all of these datasets we found the pattern of results predicted by contextual-variability theory. These findings provide critical support for contextual-variability theories of episodic memory.

AB - According to contextual-variability theory, experiences encoded at different times tend to be associated with different contextual states. The gradual evolution of context implies that spaced items will be associated with more distinct contextual states, and thus have more unique retrieval cues, than items presented in proximity. Ross and Landauer (1978) tested this theory by examining whether the probability of recalling at least one of two studied items should increase as a function of the items' spacing. Their failure to observe this result was taken as strong evidence against contextual-variability theory. We replicated their analysis on six recall datasets. For all of these datasets we found the pattern of results predicted by contextual-variability theory. These findings provide critical support for contextual-variability theories of episodic memory.

KW - Context

KW - Free recall

KW - Spacing effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951577571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951577571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79951577571

VL - 64

SP - 249

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 3

ER -