Consent, coercion and cooperativismo: Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia

Andrea Marston, Thomas A Perreault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines ways in which regional political, economic, and cultural hegemonies maintain “resource regimes” by exploring the emergence of mining cooperatives as central actors in Bolivia’s extractive economy. Like much of Latin America, Bolivia is experiencing a boom in resource extraction. Unlike other Latin American countries, in which the surge in mining activity is driven almost entirely by private, mostly transnational capital, relatively small-scale mining cooperatives play a major role in Bolivia’s mining economy. We draw on the Gramscian concepts of hegemony and the integral state to explore the historical and contemporary relationship between mining cooperatives and unfolding patterns of mineral, water, and territorial governance, particularly in Oruro and Potosí departments. We argue that the regional hegemony of the mining economy has been constructed and maintained by the close historical relationship between mining cooperatives and the Bolivian state. Since the 1930s, the state has supported the formation of mining cooperatives as a means of bolstering the mining economy and stemming political unrest; in recent decades, however, cooperatives have become more actively involved in the maintenance of mining’s regional hegemony.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-272
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Bolivia
regime
resource
resources
hegemony
economy
small scale mining
Latin America
governance
water
economics

Keywords

  • Bolivia
  • Gramsci
  • hegemony
  • Mining cooperatives
  • resource governance
  • resource regime

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Consent, coercion and cooperativismo : Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia. / Marston, Andrea; Perreault, Thomas A.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 252-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5aa4970e98344b58b96a3823a062f825,
title = "Consent, coercion and cooperativismo: Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia",
abstract = "This paper examines ways in which regional political, economic, and cultural hegemonies maintain “resource regimes” by exploring the emergence of mining cooperatives as central actors in Bolivia’s extractive economy. Like much of Latin America, Bolivia is experiencing a boom in resource extraction. Unlike other Latin American countries, in which the surge in mining activity is driven almost entirely by private, mostly transnational capital, relatively small-scale mining cooperatives play a major role in Bolivia’s mining economy. We draw on the Gramscian concepts of hegemony and the integral state to explore the historical and contemporary relationship between mining cooperatives and unfolding patterns of mineral, water, and territorial governance, particularly in Oruro and Potos{\'i} departments. We argue that the regional hegemony of the mining economy has been constructed and maintained by the close historical relationship between mining cooperatives and the Bolivian state. Since the 1930s, the state has supported the formation of mining cooperatives as a means of bolstering the mining economy and stemming political unrest; in recent decades, however, cooperatives have become more actively involved in the maintenance of mining’s regional hegemony.",
keywords = "Bolivia, Gramsci, hegemony, Mining cooperatives, resource governance, resource regime",
author = "Andrea Marston and Perreault, {Thomas A}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0308518X16674008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "252--272",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consent, coercion and cooperativismo

T2 - Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia

AU - Marston, Andrea

AU - Perreault, Thomas A

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - This paper examines ways in which regional political, economic, and cultural hegemonies maintain “resource regimes” by exploring the emergence of mining cooperatives as central actors in Bolivia’s extractive economy. Like much of Latin America, Bolivia is experiencing a boom in resource extraction. Unlike other Latin American countries, in which the surge in mining activity is driven almost entirely by private, mostly transnational capital, relatively small-scale mining cooperatives play a major role in Bolivia’s mining economy. We draw on the Gramscian concepts of hegemony and the integral state to explore the historical and contemporary relationship between mining cooperatives and unfolding patterns of mineral, water, and territorial governance, particularly in Oruro and Potosí departments. We argue that the regional hegemony of the mining economy has been constructed and maintained by the close historical relationship between mining cooperatives and the Bolivian state. Since the 1930s, the state has supported the formation of mining cooperatives as a means of bolstering the mining economy and stemming political unrest; in recent decades, however, cooperatives have become more actively involved in the maintenance of mining’s regional hegemony.

AB - This paper examines ways in which regional political, economic, and cultural hegemonies maintain “resource regimes” by exploring the emergence of mining cooperatives as central actors in Bolivia’s extractive economy. Like much of Latin America, Bolivia is experiencing a boom in resource extraction. Unlike other Latin American countries, in which the surge in mining activity is driven almost entirely by private, mostly transnational capital, relatively small-scale mining cooperatives play a major role in Bolivia’s mining economy. We draw on the Gramscian concepts of hegemony and the integral state to explore the historical and contemporary relationship between mining cooperatives and unfolding patterns of mineral, water, and territorial governance, particularly in Oruro and Potosí departments. We argue that the regional hegemony of the mining economy has been constructed and maintained by the close historical relationship between mining cooperatives and the Bolivian state. Since the 1930s, the state has supported the formation of mining cooperatives as a means of bolstering the mining economy and stemming political unrest; in recent decades, however, cooperatives have become more actively involved in the maintenance of mining’s regional hegemony.

KW - Bolivia

KW - Gramsci

KW - hegemony

KW - Mining cooperatives

KW - resource governance

KW - resource regime

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011573674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011573674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0308518X16674008

DO - 10.1177/0308518X16674008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011573674

VL - 49

SP - 252

EP - 272

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 2

ER -