TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of GT3X accelerometer and YAMAX pedometer steps/day in a free-living sample of overweight and obese adults
AU - Barreira, Tiago V.
AU - Tudor-Locke, Catrine
AU - Champagne, Catherine M.
AU - Broyles, Stephanie T.
AU - Johnson, William D.
AU - Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare steps/day detected by the YAMAX SW-200 pedometer versus the Actigraph GT3X accelerometer in free-living adults. Methods: Daily YAMAX and GT3X steps were collected from a sample of 23 overweight and obese participants (78% female; age = 52.6 ± 8.4 yr.; BMI = 31.0 ± 3.7 m·kg-2). Because a pedometer is more likely to be used in a community-based intervention program, it was used as the standard for comparison. Percent difference (PD) and absolute percent difference (APD) were calculated to examine between-instrument agreement. In addition, days were categorized based on PD: a) under-counting (> -10 PD), b) acceptable counting (-10 to 10 PD), and c) over-counting (> 10 PD). Results: The YAMAX and GT3X detected 8,025 ± 3,967 and 7131 ± 3066 steps/day, respectively, and the outputs were highly correlated (r = .87). Average PD was -3.1% ± 30.7% and average APD was 23.9% ± 19.4%. Relative to the YAMAX, 53% of the days detected by the GT3X were classified as under-counting, 25% acceptable counting, and 23% over-counting. Conclusion: Although the output of these 2 instruments is highly correlated, caution is advised when directly comparing or using their output interchangeably.
AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare steps/day detected by the YAMAX SW-200 pedometer versus the Actigraph GT3X accelerometer in free-living adults. Methods: Daily YAMAX and GT3X steps were collected from a sample of 23 overweight and obese participants (78% female; age = 52.6 ± 8.4 yr.; BMI = 31.0 ± 3.7 m·kg-2). Because a pedometer is more likely to be used in a community-based intervention program, it was used as the standard for comparison. Percent difference (PD) and absolute percent difference (APD) were calculated to examine between-instrument agreement. In addition, days were categorized based on PD: a) under-counting (> -10 PD), b) acceptable counting (-10 to 10 PD), and c) over-counting (> 10 PD). Results: The YAMAX and GT3X detected 8,025 ± 3,967 and 7131 ± 3066 steps/day, respectively, and the outputs were highly correlated (r = .87). Average PD was -3.1% ± 30.7% and average APD was 23.9% ± 19.4%. Relative to the YAMAX, 53% of the days detected by the GT3X were classified as under-counting, 25% acceptable counting, and 23% over-counting. Conclusion: Although the output of these 2 instruments is highly correlated, caution is advised when directly comparing or using their output interchangeably.
KW - Agreement
KW - Community-based
KW - Difference
KW - Exercise
KW - Physical activity
KW - Walking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873346080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873346080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.10.2.263
DO - 10.1123/jpah.10.2.263
M3 - Article
C2 - 22821951
AN - SCOPUS:84873346080
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 10
SP - 263
EP - 270
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 2
ER -