Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories

J. L. Smith, Shobha K Bhatia, C. J. Sprague

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geosynthetic rolled erosion control products (RECPs) are used extensively to minimize soil erosion and enhance the growth of vegetation on slopes and in channels. RECPs suitable for these applications come in a variety of different fiber and structure types, ranging from coir erosion control blankets (ECBs), jute open weave textiles (OWTs), to polyolefin turf reinforcement mats (TRMs). Although there is a wide variety of products available, engineers are often given little guidance on the selection of RECPs beyond maximum allowable slope, velocity, and shear stress. RECPs can vary significantly in basic index properties and overall field performance. More than a decade ago, the Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC), in conjunction with TRI/Environmental, Inc. (TRI), developed several index tests in an effort to compare and standardize RECPs. Although these tests are used extensively to characterize different RECPs, no studies have been conducted that evaluate the repeatability, reproducibility, or usefulness of these tests beyond those conducted at TRI. This paper presents the results of a comparative study of two index tests (light penetration and water absorption) for several different RECPs between Syracuse University and ECTC. These tests were selected for evaluation because the properties these tests measure have been identified by several researchers as being important to the performance of RECPs. Based on the results of the evaluation, a new test for evaluating the water absorptive behavior of RECPs is proposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeotechnical Special Publication
Pages212-221
Number of pages10
Edition210 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Event5th International Conference on Scour and Erosion - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Nov 7 2010Nov 10 2010

Other

Other5th International Conference on Scour and Erosion
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period11/7/1011/10/10

Fingerprint

erosion control
geosynthetics
Erosion
comparison
product
laboratory
coir
Jute fibers
Polyolefins
test
Water absorption
reinforcement
shear stress
soil erosion
comparative study
Shear stress
penetration
Textiles
Reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture

Cite this

Smith, J. L., Bhatia, S. K., & Sprague, C. J. (2010). Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories. In Geotechnical Special Publication (210 GSP ed., pp. 212-221) https://doi.org/10.1061/41147(392)20

Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories. / Smith, J. L.; Bhatia, Shobha K; Sprague, C. J.

Geotechnical Special Publication. 210 GSP. ed. 2010. p. 212-221.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Smith, JL, Bhatia, SK & Sprague, CJ 2010, Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories. in Geotechnical Special Publication. 210 GSP edn, pp. 212-221, 5th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, San Francisco, CA, United States, 11/7/10. https://doi.org/10.1061/41147(392)20
Smith, J. L. ; Bhatia, Shobha K ; Sprague, C. J. / Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories. Geotechnical Special Publication. 210 GSP. ed. 2010. pp. 212-221
@inproceedings{3c97682160e54f1f9426ba7e4bfd87de,
title = "Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories",
abstract = "Geosynthetic rolled erosion control products (RECPs) are used extensively to minimize soil erosion and enhance the growth of vegetation on slopes and in channels. RECPs suitable for these applications come in a variety of different fiber and structure types, ranging from coir erosion control blankets (ECBs), jute open weave textiles (OWTs), to polyolefin turf reinforcement mats (TRMs). Although there is a wide variety of products available, engineers are often given little guidance on the selection of RECPs beyond maximum allowable slope, velocity, and shear stress. RECPs can vary significantly in basic index properties and overall field performance. More than a decade ago, the Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC), in conjunction with TRI/Environmental, Inc. (TRI), developed several index tests in an effort to compare and standardize RECPs. Although these tests are used extensively to characterize different RECPs, no studies have been conducted that evaluate the repeatability, reproducibility, or usefulness of these tests beyond those conducted at TRI. This paper presents the results of a comparative study of two index tests (light penetration and water absorption) for several different RECPs between Syracuse University and ECTC. These tests were selected for evaluation because the properties these tests measure have been identified by several researchers as being important to the performance of RECPs. Based on the results of the evaluation, a new test for evaluating the water absorptive behavior of RECPs is proposed.",
author = "Smith, {J. L.} and Bhatia, {Shobha K} and Sprague, {C. J.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1061/41147(392)20",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411476",
pages = "212--221",
booktitle = "Geotechnical Special Publication",
edition = "210 GSP",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of geosynthetic rolled erosion control product (RECP) properties between laboratories

AU - Smith, J. L.

AU - Bhatia, Shobha K

AU - Sprague, C. J.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Geosynthetic rolled erosion control products (RECPs) are used extensively to minimize soil erosion and enhance the growth of vegetation on slopes and in channels. RECPs suitable for these applications come in a variety of different fiber and structure types, ranging from coir erosion control blankets (ECBs), jute open weave textiles (OWTs), to polyolefin turf reinforcement mats (TRMs). Although there is a wide variety of products available, engineers are often given little guidance on the selection of RECPs beyond maximum allowable slope, velocity, and shear stress. RECPs can vary significantly in basic index properties and overall field performance. More than a decade ago, the Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC), in conjunction with TRI/Environmental, Inc. (TRI), developed several index tests in an effort to compare and standardize RECPs. Although these tests are used extensively to characterize different RECPs, no studies have been conducted that evaluate the repeatability, reproducibility, or usefulness of these tests beyond those conducted at TRI. This paper presents the results of a comparative study of two index tests (light penetration and water absorption) for several different RECPs between Syracuse University and ECTC. These tests were selected for evaluation because the properties these tests measure have been identified by several researchers as being important to the performance of RECPs. Based on the results of the evaluation, a new test for evaluating the water absorptive behavior of RECPs is proposed.

AB - Geosynthetic rolled erosion control products (RECPs) are used extensively to minimize soil erosion and enhance the growth of vegetation on slopes and in channels. RECPs suitable for these applications come in a variety of different fiber and structure types, ranging from coir erosion control blankets (ECBs), jute open weave textiles (OWTs), to polyolefin turf reinforcement mats (TRMs). Although there is a wide variety of products available, engineers are often given little guidance on the selection of RECPs beyond maximum allowable slope, velocity, and shear stress. RECPs can vary significantly in basic index properties and overall field performance. More than a decade ago, the Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC), in conjunction with TRI/Environmental, Inc. (TRI), developed several index tests in an effort to compare and standardize RECPs. Although these tests are used extensively to characterize different RECPs, no studies have been conducted that evaluate the repeatability, reproducibility, or usefulness of these tests beyond those conducted at TRI. This paper presents the results of a comparative study of two index tests (light penetration and water absorption) for several different RECPs between Syracuse University and ECTC. These tests were selected for evaluation because the properties these tests measure have been identified by several researchers as being important to the performance of RECPs. Based on the results of the evaluation, a new test for evaluating the water absorptive behavior of RECPs is proposed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890954862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890954862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41147(392)20

DO - 10.1061/41147(392)20

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84890954862

SN - 9780784411476

SP - 212

EP - 221

BT - Geotechnical Special Publication

ER -