TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing two different family-based childhood obesity treatment programmes in a medically underserved region
T2 - Effectiveness, engagement and implementation outcomes from a randomized controlled trial
AU - Zoellner, Jamie M.
AU - You, Wen
AU - Hill, Jennie L.
AU - Brock, Donna Jean P.
AU - Yuhas, Maryam
AU - Price, Bryan
AU - Wilson, Jonathon
AU - Montague, Danielle R.
AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 World Obesity Federation
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Access to evidence- and family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions is a challenge, especially in underserved regions where childhood obesity disparities persist. Objective: Compare two 6-month FBCO treatment interventions, iChoose (high intensity, parent–child dyads) and Family Connections (low intensity, parents only), in one underserved US region. Methods: This unblinded, RCT reports on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Eligibility included children ages 5–12 with BMI ≥85th percentile. Analyses included descriptive statistics and intention-to-treat Heckman treatment effect models. Results: Enrolled children (n = 139, mean age 10.1 ± 1.7 years, 30% with overweight, 70% with obesity, 45% black, 63% Medicaid) were randomly assigned to iChoose (n = 70) or Family Connections (n = 69). Retention rates were 63% for iChoose and 84% for Family Connection. Among children, 6-month BMI z-score changes were not statistically significant within iChoose [BMI z-score 0.03 (95% CI = −0.13, 0.19)] or Family Connections [BMI z-score 0.00 (95% CI = −0.16, 0.16)]. Likewise, parents' BMI changes were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Both programmes were delivered with high fidelity (77%–100%). Engagement in core components was 25%–36% for iChoose and 52%–61% for Family Connections. Implementation costs per child with improved BMI z-score were $2841 for iChoose and $955 for Family Connections. Conclusions: Neither intervention yielded significant improvements in child BMI z-score or parent BMI, yet both were delivered with high fidelity. Relative to iChoose, descriptive data indicated higher retention, better engagement, and lower costs for Family Connections—suggesting that a lower intensity and parent-focused programme may better fit the intended audience's context.
AB - Background: Access to evidence- and family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions is a challenge, especially in underserved regions where childhood obesity disparities persist. Objective: Compare two 6-month FBCO treatment interventions, iChoose (high intensity, parent–child dyads) and Family Connections (low intensity, parents only), in one underserved US region. Methods: This unblinded, RCT reports on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Eligibility included children ages 5–12 with BMI ≥85th percentile. Analyses included descriptive statistics and intention-to-treat Heckman treatment effect models. Results: Enrolled children (n = 139, mean age 10.1 ± 1.7 years, 30% with overweight, 70% with obesity, 45% black, 63% Medicaid) were randomly assigned to iChoose (n = 70) or Family Connections (n = 69). Retention rates were 63% for iChoose and 84% for Family Connection. Among children, 6-month BMI z-score changes were not statistically significant within iChoose [BMI z-score 0.03 (95% CI = −0.13, 0.19)] or Family Connections [BMI z-score 0.00 (95% CI = −0.16, 0.16)]. Likewise, parents' BMI changes were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Both programmes were delivered with high fidelity (77%–100%). Engagement in core components was 25%–36% for iChoose and 52%–61% for Family Connections. Implementation costs per child with improved BMI z-score were $2841 for iChoose and $955 for Family Connections. Conclusions: Neither intervention yielded significant improvements in child BMI z-score or parent BMI, yet both were delivered with high fidelity. Relative to iChoose, descriptive data indicated higher retention, better engagement, and lower costs for Family Connections—suggesting that a lower intensity and parent-focused programme may better fit the intended audience's context.
KW - behavioural intervention
KW - childhood obesity
KW - community-based participatory research
KW - minority groups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112395589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112395589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijpo.12840
DO - 10.1111/ijpo.12840
M3 - Article
C2 - 34396714
AN - SCOPUS:85112395589
SN - 2047-6302
VL - 17
JO - Pediatric Obesity
JF - Pediatric Obesity
IS - 1
M1 - e12840
ER -