TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing two different family-based childhood obesity treatment programmes in a medically underserved region
T2 - Effectiveness, engagement and implementation outcomes from a randomized controlled trial
AU - Zoellner, Jamie M.
AU - You, Wen
AU - Hill, Jennie L.
AU - Brock, Donna Jean P.
AU - Yuhas, Maryam
AU - Price, Bryan
AU - Wilson, Jonathon
AU - Montague, Danielle R.
AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.
N1 - Funding Information:
PE and JZ proposed study hypotheses and secured funding. PE, DB, MY and BP developed curriculum materials. PE, DB, MY, BP, JW and DM were responsible for programme implementation and fidelity monitoring. JZ, DB, MY, BP, JW, and DM managed family recruitment and data collection. JZ, WY, JH, DB, MY, BP and PE were responsible for guiding and reviewing interpretation of all process and outcome data reports. WY conducted final statistical analyses. JZ drafted the initial manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and are personally accountable for the accuracy of this manuscript. Research reported in this publication was funded through a Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (AD‐1602‐34489). PCORI was not involved is the design of this study or writing of this manuscript. The statements in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. We would like to recognize CAB members who have been instrumental in the execution of this study: Jason Bookheimer, Beth Thomas, Stephanie Phelps, Deana Jones, Paige Shelton, Kenya Elliott, and Marsha Mendenhall. We would also like to thank all the PAT members for their commitment and enthusiasm for this study. We especially acknowledge the unwavering support from our PAT members Wanda Breedlove, Pamela Carter‐Taylor, Julie Matejko, Misty Roveta, and Tia Yancy.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 World Obesity Federation
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Access to evidence- and family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions is a challenge, especially in underserved regions where childhood obesity disparities persist. Objective: Compare two 6-month FBCO treatment interventions, iChoose (high intensity, parent–child dyads) and Family Connections (low intensity, parents only), in one underserved US region. Methods: This unblinded, RCT reports on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Eligibility included children ages 5–12 with BMI ≥85th percentile. Analyses included descriptive statistics and intention-to-treat Heckman treatment effect models. Results: Enrolled children (n = 139, mean age 10.1 ± 1.7 years, 30% with overweight, 70% with obesity, 45% black, 63% Medicaid) were randomly assigned to iChoose (n = 70) or Family Connections (n = 69). Retention rates were 63% for iChoose and 84% for Family Connection. Among children, 6-month BMI z-score changes were not statistically significant within iChoose [BMI z-score 0.03 (95% CI = −0.13, 0.19)] or Family Connections [BMI z-score 0.00 (95% CI = −0.16, 0.16)]. Likewise, parents' BMI changes were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Both programmes were delivered with high fidelity (77%–100%). Engagement in core components was 25%–36% for iChoose and 52%–61% for Family Connections. Implementation costs per child with improved BMI z-score were $2841 for iChoose and $955 for Family Connections. Conclusions: Neither intervention yielded significant improvements in child BMI z-score or parent BMI, yet both were delivered with high fidelity. Relative to iChoose, descriptive data indicated higher retention, better engagement, and lower costs for Family Connections—suggesting that a lower intensity and parent-focused programme may better fit the intended audience's context.
AB - Background: Access to evidence- and family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions is a challenge, especially in underserved regions where childhood obesity disparities persist. Objective: Compare two 6-month FBCO treatment interventions, iChoose (high intensity, parent–child dyads) and Family Connections (low intensity, parents only), in one underserved US region. Methods: This unblinded, RCT reports on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Eligibility included children ages 5–12 with BMI ≥85th percentile. Analyses included descriptive statistics and intention-to-treat Heckman treatment effect models. Results: Enrolled children (n = 139, mean age 10.1 ± 1.7 years, 30% with overweight, 70% with obesity, 45% black, 63% Medicaid) were randomly assigned to iChoose (n = 70) or Family Connections (n = 69). Retention rates were 63% for iChoose and 84% for Family Connection. Among children, 6-month BMI z-score changes were not statistically significant within iChoose [BMI z-score 0.03 (95% CI = −0.13, 0.19)] or Family Connections [BMI z-score 0.00 (95% CI = −0.16, 0.16)]. Likewise, parents' BMI changes were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Both programmes were delivered with high fidelity (77%–100%). Engagement in core components was 25%–36% for iChoose and 52%–61% for Family Connections. Implementation costs per child with improved BMI z-score were $2841 for iChoose and $955 for Family Connections. Conclusions: Neither intervention yielded significant improvements in child BMI z-score or parent BMI, yet both were delivered with high fidelity. Relative to iChoose, descriptive data indicated higher retention, better engagement, and lower costs for Family Connections—suggesting that a lower intensity and parent-focused programme may better fit the intended audience's context.
KW - behavioural intervention
KW - childhood obesity
KW - community-based participatory research
KW - minority groups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112395589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112395589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijpo.12840
DO - 10.1111/ijpo.12840
M3 - Article
C2 - 34396714
AN - SCOPUS:85112395589
SN - 2047-6302
VL - 17
JO - Pediatric Obesity
JF - Pediatric Obesity
IS - 1
M1 - e12840
ER -