Coercion and Provocation

Allan Dafoe, Sophia Hatz, Baobao Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Threats and force, by increasing expected costs, should reduce the target’s resolve. However, they often seem to increase resolve. We label this phenomenon provocation. We review instances of apparent provocation in interstate relations and offer a theory based on the logic of reputation and honor. We also consider alternative explanations: confounding or mis-imputation of resolve; revelation of information, character, or capabilities; or generalized sunk cost reasoning. Using survey experiments, we systematically evaluate whether provocation exists and what may account for it. We employ design-based causal inference techniques—a hypothetical natural experiment, a placebo treatment, and ruling out mediators—to evaluate our key hypotheses. We find strong evidence of provocation and suggestive evidence that it arises from considerations of honor, vengeance, and reputation. Our experimental design minimizes the risk that this result arises from our alternative explanations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-402
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume65
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • international security
  • interstate conflict
  • militarized interstate disputes
  • use of force

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coercion and Provocation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this