Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment

Suyeon Jo, Tina Nabatchi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advocates claim that in comparison to traditional models of service delivery, co-production can have many benefits for citizens (e.g., Levine and Fisher, 1984; Needham, 2008). This chapter explores those claims, and focuses specifically on the potential empowerment effects of co-production for citizens. The basic argument is that when citizens play proactive roles through co-production, services become more closely aligned with their interests and needs (Whitaker, 1980; Brudney and England, 1983; Levine and Fisher, 1984; Pestoff, 2006; Thomas, 2013), which leads to greater satisfaction with services (Pestoff, 2006; Voorberg, Bekkers and Tummers, 2015). Moreover, the process of exercising voice, control, and influence (which is generally absent in traditional service delivery) generates a sense of empowerment among citizens (Needham, 2008). To unpack this argument, we begin with a brief discussion about co-production and its application at the individual, group, and collective levels. We then introduce a theory of empowerment and draw connections to each level of co-production. Finally, we review the literature, concentrating on empirical studies that examine empowerment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCo-Production and Co-Creation
Subtitle of host publicationEngaging Citizens in Public Services
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages231-239
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781351792578
ISBN (Print)9781138700116
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

coproduction
empowerment
citizen
role play
Co-creation
Co-production
Empowerment
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Jo, S., & Nabatchi, T. (2018). Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services (pp. 231-239). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956

Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. / Jo, Suyeon; Nabatchi, Tina.

Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 231-239.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Jo, S & Nabatchi, T 2018, Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. in Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Taylor and Francis, pp. 231-239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Jo S, Nabatchi T. Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 231-239 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Jo, Suyeon ; Nabatchi, Tina. / Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 231-239
@inbook{84367d1a5b0b48f78995362d3d6f6d96,
title = "Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment",
abstract = "Advocates claim that in comparison to traditional models of service delivery, co-production can have many benefits for citizens (e.g., Levine and Fisher, 1984; Needham, 2008). This chapter explores those claims, and focuses specifically on the potential empowerment effects of co-production for citizens. The basic argument is that when citizens play proactive roles through co-production, services become more closely aligned with their interests and needs (Whitaker, 1980; Brudney and England, 1983; Levine and Fisher, 1984; Pestoff, 2006; Thomas, 2013), which leads to greater satisfaction with services (Pestoff, 2006; Voorberg, Bekkers and Tummers, 2015). Moreover, the process of exercising voice, control, and influence (which is generally absent in traditional service delivery) generates a sense of empowerment among citizens (Needham, 2008). To unpack this argument, we begin with a brief discussion about co-production and its application at the individual, group, and collective levels. We then introduce a theory of empowerment and draw connections to each level of co-production. Finally, we review the literature, concentrating on empirical studies that examine empowerment.",
author = "Suyeon Jo and Tina Nabatchi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315204956",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138700116",
pages = "231--239",
booktitle = "Co-Production and Co-Creation",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment

AU - Jo, Suyeon

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Advocates claim that in comparison to traditional models of service delivery, co-production can have many benefits for citizens (e.g., Levine and Fisher, 1984; Needham, 2008). This chapter explores those claims, and focuses specifically on the potential empowerment effects of co-production for citizens. The basic argument is that when citizens play proactive roles through co-production, services become more closely aligned with their interests and needs (Whitaker, 1980; Brudney and England, 1983; Levine and Fisher, 1984; Pestoff, 2006; Thomas, 2013), which leads to greater satisfaction with services (Pestoff, 2006; Voorberg, Bekkers and Tummers, 2015). Moreover, the process of exercising voice, control, and influence (which is generally absent in traditional service delivery) generates a sense of empowerment among citizens (Needham, 2008). To unpack this argument, we begin with a brief discussion about co-production and its application at the individual, group, and collective levels. We then introduce a theory of empowerment and draw connections to each level of co-production. Finally, we review the literature, concentrating on empirical studies that examine empowerment.

AB - Advocates claim that in comparison to traditional models of service delivery, co-production can have many benefits for citizens (e.g., Levine and Fisher, 1984; Needham, 2008). This chapter explores those claims, and focuses specifically on the potential empowerment effects of co-production for citizens. The basic argument is that when citizens play proactive roles through co-production, services become more closely aligned with their interests and needs (Whitaker, 1980; Brudney and England, 1983; Levine and Fisher, 1984; Pestoff, 2006; Thomas, 2013), which leads to greater satisfaction with services (Pestoff, 2006; Voorberg, Bekkers and Tummers, 2015). Moreover, the process of exercising voice, control, and influence (which is generally absent in traditional service delivery) generates a sense of empowerment among citizens (Needham, 2008). To unpack this argument, we begin with a brief discussion about co-production and its application at the individual, group, and collective levels. We then introduce a theory of empowerment and draw connections to each level of co-production. Finally, we review the literature, concentrating on empirical studies that examine empowerment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047024375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047024375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315204956

DO - 10.4324/9781315204956

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85047024375

SN - 9781138700116

SP - 231

EP - 239

BT - Co-Production and Co-Creation

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -