TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate–water crises
T2 - critically engaging relational, spatial, and temporal dimensions
AU - Wilson, Nicole J.
AU - Shah, Sameer H.
AU - Montoya, Teresa
AU - Fallon Grasham, Catherine
AU - Korzenevica, Marina
AU - Octavianti, Thanti
AU - Vonk, Jaynie
AU - Sultana, Farhana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the author(s).
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Declarations of water crises have been ubiquitous in water policy and practice for decades. In the face of unprecedented human-caused climate change, the circulation of water crisis discourses has increased in frequency. How crises are defined and made meaningful, however, is often assumed to be commonly agreed upon. Reviewing scholarship at the intersections of water and climate, we show that crisis discourses are inherently political because they depend both on the authority and legitimacy to delineate exceptions from norms, and on the powers to mobilize resources to respond to constructions of crisis. Engaging with crisis as an explicitly normative concept helps situate analyses within the social, historical, political, and geographic particularities of water–climate systems. We identify three interrelated analytical frames that assist with this task: relationality, spatiality, and temporality. Our review hopes to better position researchers, policy makers, and activists to critically engage with crisis narratives. Doing so can effectively advance more critical, creative, and imaginative crisis responses.
AB - Declarations of water crises have been ubiquitous in water policy and practice for decades. In the face of unprecedented human-caused climate change, the circulation of water crisis discourses has increased in frequency. How crises are defined and made meaningful, however, is often assumed to be commonly agreed upon. Reviewing scholarship at the intersections of water and climate, we show that crisis discourses are inherently political because they depend both on the authority and legitimacy to delineate exceptions from norms, and on the powers to mobilize resources to respond to constructions of crisis. Engaging with crisis as an explicitly normative concept helps situate analyses within the social, historical, political, and geographic particularities of water–climate systems. We identify three interrelated analytical frames that assist with this task: relationality, spatiality, and temporality. Our review hopes to better position researchers, policy makers, and activists to critically engage with crisis narratives. Doing so can effectively advance more critical, creative, and imaginative crisis responses.
KW - climate change
KW - climate crisis
KW - hydrosocial
KW - water crisis
KW - water policy and governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208693078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85208693078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5751/ES-15469-290413
DO - 10.5751/ES-15469-290413
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208693078
SN - 1708-3087
VL - 29
JO - Ecology and Society
JF - Ecology and Society
IS - 4
M1 - 13
ER -