TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing sensorimotor profiles in children with residual speech sound disorder
T2 - a pilot study
AU - Kabakoff, Heather
AU - Gritsyk, Olesia
AU - Harel, Daphna
AU - Tiede, Mark
AU - Preston, Jonathan L.
AU - Whalen, D. H.
AU - McAllister, Tara
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Grant F31DC018197 (H. Kabakoff, PI), Grant R01DC013668 (D.H. Whalen, PI), and Grant R01DC017476 (T. McAllister, PI). Additional support was provided through an Acoustical Society of American Stetson Scholarship and an American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation New Century Scholars Doctoral Scholarship.
Funding Information:
We thank Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. for making their Acuson ultrasound scanner available for this project. We gratefully acknowledge Emily Phillips for treatment administration at Haskins, Sam Pearl Beames for processing video to measure ultrasound probe alignment, and Amanda Eads for completing formant measurement for the reliability analysis. We also extend gratitude to the ultrasound image tracing and reliability leadership team, including Graham Tomkins Feeny, Sam Pearl Beames, and Zhigong Ma.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Purpose: Children with speech errors who have reduced motor skill may be more likely to develop residual errors associated with lifelong challenges. Drawing on models of speech production that highlight the role of somatosensory acuity in updating motor plans, this pilot study explored the relationship between motor skill and speech accuracy, and between somatosensory acuity and motor skill in children. Understanding the connections among sensorimotor measures and speech outcomes may offer insight into how somatosensation and motor skill cooperate during speech production, which could inform treatment decisions for this population. Method: Twenty-five children (ages 9-14) produced syllables in an /ɹ/ stimulability task before and after an ultrasound biofeedback treatment program targeting rhotics. We first tested whether motor skill (as measured by two ultrasound-based metrics of tongue shape complexity) predicted acoustically measured accuracy (the normalized difference between the second and third formant frequencies). We then tested whether somatosensory acuity (as measured by an oral stereognosis task) predicted motor skill, while controlling for auditory acuity. Results: One measure of tongue shape complexity was a significant predictor of accuracy, such that higher tongue shape complexity was associated with lower accuracy at pre-treatment but higher accuracy at post-treatment. Based on the same measure, children with better somatosensory acuity produced /ɹ/ tongue shapes that were more complex, but this relationship was only present at post-treatment. Conclusion: The predicted relationships among somatosensory acuity, motor skill, and acoustically measured /ɹ/ production accuracy were observed after treatment, but unexpectedly did not hold before treatment. The surprising finding that greater tongue shape complexity was associated with lower accuracy at pre-treatment highlights the importance of evaluating tongue shape patterns (e.g., using ultrasound) prior to treatment, and has the potential to suggest that children with high tongue shape complexity at pre-treatment may be good candidates for ultrasound-based treatment.
AB - Purpose: Children with speech errors who have reduced motor skill may be more likely to develop residual errors associated with lifelong challenges. Drawing on models of speech production that highlight the role of somatosensory acuity in updating motor plans, this pilot study explored the relationship between motor skill and speech accuracy, and between somatosensory acuity and motor skill in children. Understanding the connections among sensorimotor measures and speech outcomes may offer insight into how somatosensation and motor skill cooperate during speech production, which could inform treatment decisions for this population. Method: Twenty-five children (ages 9-14) produced syllables in an /ɹ/ stimulability task before and after an ultrasound biofeedback treatment program targeting rhotics. We first tested whether motor skill (as measured by two ultrasound-based metrics of tongue shape complexity) predicted acoustically measured accuracy (the normalized difference between the second and third formant frequencies). We then tested whether somatosensory acuity (as measured by an oral stereognosis task) predicted motor skill, while controlling for auditory acuity. Results: One measure of tongue shape complexity was a significant predictor of accuracy, such that higher tongue shape complexity was associated with lower accuracy at pre-treatment but higher accuracy at post-treatment. Based on the same measure, children with better somatosensory acuity produced /ɹ/ tongue shapes that were more complex, but this relationship was only present at post-treatment. Conclusion: The predicted relationships among somatosensory acuity, motor skill, and acoustically measured /ɹ/ production accuracy were observed after treatment, but unexpectedly did not hold before treatment. The surprising finding that greater tongue shape complexity was associated with lower accuracy at pre-treatment highlights the importance of evaluating tongue shape patterns (e.g., using ultrasound) prior to treatment, and has the potential to suggest that children with high tongue shape complexity at pre-treatment may be good candidates for ultrasound-based treatment.
KW - residual speech sound disorder
KW - somatosensory skill
KW - speech sound disorder
KW - tongue shape complexity
KW - ultrasound biofeedback treatment
KW - ultrasound imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132740285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132740285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106230
DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106230
M3 - Article
C2 - 35728449
AN - SCOPUS:85132740285
SN - 0021-9924
VL - 99
JO - Journal of Communication Disorders
JF - Journal of Communication Disorders
M1 - 106230
ER -