TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenging control
T2 - Inclusive teachers and teaching assistants discourse on students with challenging behaviour
AU - Orsati, Fernanda T.
AU - Causton-Theoharis, Julie
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - Describing students with disabilities as presenting challenging behaviour is common in US schools. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the discourse utilised by teachers in order to understand their beliefs and practices surrounding young students considered to present challenging behaviour. This study examines teachers language in four ways: which discourses they draw from, the consequences of engaging in the discourse on practice, what maintains the use of such discourse and finally the possibilities for change. The critical discourse analysis unpacked that teachers begin labelling the students as challenging, not the behaviour. Consequences of this thinking emerged as teachers excluded the students, or what they consider the problems from the classroom. Exclusion was found to be the necessary response when control is prioritised in the classroom. In sum, the discourse of control is available for shaping how teachers understand and support students. Developing a relationship with students empowers teachers to see past the labels, the control discourse, and truly support students in inclusive classrooms. Finally, implications for practice are shared to improve the experience of inclusive education for both student and teacher.
AB - Describing students with disabilities as presenting challenging behaviour is common in US schools. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the discourse utilised by teachers in order to understand their beliefs and practices surrounding young students considered to present challenging behaviour. This study examines teachers language in four ways: which discourses they draw from, the consequences of engaging in the discourse on practice, what maintains the use of such discourse and finally the possibilities for change. The critical discourse analysis unpacked that teachers begin labelling the students as challenging, not the behaviour. Consequences of this thinking emerged as teachers excluded the students, or what they consider the problems from the classroom. Exclusion was found to be the necessary response when control is prioritised in the classroom. In sum, the discourse of control is available for shaping how teachers understand and support students. Developing a relationship with students empowers teachers to see past the labels, the control discourse, and truly support students in inclusive classrooms. Finally, implications for practice are shared to improve the experience of inclusive education for both student and teacher.
KW - behaviour
KW - disability
KW - inclusive education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878611291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878611291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13603116.2012.689016
DO - 10.1080/13603116.2012.689016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878611291
SN - 1360-3116
VL - 17
SP - 507
EP - 525
JO - International Journal of Inclusive Education
JF - International Journal of Inclusive Education
IS - 5
ER -