Cation flux in the ehrlich ascites tumor cell evidence for Na⁺-for-Na⁺ and K⁺-for-K⁺ exchange diffusion

In a previous study, evidence was presented for an external Na⁺-dependent, ouabain-insensitive component of Na⁺ efflux and an external K⁺-dependent component of K⁺ efflux in the Ehrlich ascites tumor cell. Evidence is now presented that these components are inhibited by the diuretic furosemide and that under conditions of normal extracellular Na⁺ and K⁺ they represent Na⁺-for-Na⁺ and K-⁺for-K⁺ exchange mechanisms. Using ⁸⁶Rb to monitor K⁺ movements, furosemide is shown to inhibit an ouabain-insensitive component of Rb⁺ influx and a component of Rb⁺ efflux, both representing approx. 30% of the total fux. Inhibition of Rb⁺ efflux is greatly reduced by removal of extracellular K⁺. Furosemide does not alter steady-state levels of intracellular K⁺ and it does not prevent cells depleted of K⁺ by incubation in the cold from regaining K⁺ upon warming. Using ²²Na to monitor Na⁺ movements, furosemide is shown to inhibit an ouabain-insensitive component of unidirectional Na⁺ efflux which represents approx. 22% of total Na⁺ efflux. Furosemide does not alter steady-state levels of intracellular Na⁺ and does not prevent removal of intracellular Na⁺ upon warming from cells loaded with Na⁺ by preincubation in the cold. The ability of furosemide to affect unidirectional Na⁺ and K⁺ fluxes but not net fluxes is consistent with the conclusion that these components of cation movement across the cell membrane represent one-for-one exchange mechanisms. Data are also presented which demonstrate that the uptake of α-aminoisobutyrate is not affected by furosemide. This indicates that these components of cation flux are not directly involved in the Na⁺-dependent amino acid transport system A.