TY - JOUR
T1 - Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land
T2 - Ten diet scenarios
AU - Peters, Christian J.
AU - Picardy, Jamie
AU - Darrouzet-Nardi, Amelia F.
AU - Wilkins, Jennifer L.
AU - Griffin, Timothy S.
AU - Fick, Gary W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Peters et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Strategies for environmental sustainability and global food security must account for dietary change. Using a biophysical simulation model we calculated human carrying capacity under ten diet scenarios. The scenarios included two reference diets based on actual consumption and eight "Healthy Diet" scenarios that complied with nutritional recommendations but varied in the level of meat content. We considered the U.S. agricultural land base and accounted for losses, processing conversions, livestock feed needs, suitability of land for crops or grazing, and land productivity. Annual per capita land requirements ranged from 0.13 to 1.08 ha person-1 year-1 across the ten diet scenarios. Carrying capacity varied from 402 to 807 million persons; 1.3 to 2.6 times the 2010 U.S. population. Carrying capacity was generally higher for scenarios with less meat and highest for the lacto-vegetarian diet. However, the carrying capacity of the vegan diet was lower than two of the healthy omnivore diet scenarios. Sensitivity analysis showed that carrying capacity estimates were highly influenced by starting assumptions about the proportion of cropland available for cultivated cropping. Population level dietary change can contribute substantially to meeting future food needs, though ongoing agricultural research and sustainable management practices are still needed to assure sufficient production levels.
AB - Strategies for environmental sustainability and global food security must account for dietary change. Using a biophysical simulation model we calculated human carrying capacity under ten diet scenarios. The scenarios included two reference diets based on actual consumption and eight "Healthy Diet" scenarios that complied with nutritional recommendations but varied in the level of meat content. We considered the U.S. agricultural land base and accounted for losses, processing conversions, livestock feed needs, suitability of land for crops or grazing, and land productivity. Annual per capita land requirements ranged from 0.13 to 1.08 ha person-1 year-1 across the ten diet scenarios. Carrying capacity varied from 402 to 807 million persons; 1.3 to 2.6 times the 2010 U.S. population. Carrying capacity was generally higher for scenarios with less meat and highest for the lacto-vegetarian diet. However, the carrying capacity of the vegan diet was lower than two of the healthy omnivore diet scenarios. Sensitivity analysis showed that carrying capacity estimates were highly influenced by starting assumptions about the proportion of cropland available for cultivated cropping. Population level dietary change can contribute substantially to meeting future food needs, though ongoing agricultural research and sustainable management practices are still needed to assure sufficient production levels.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986320298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986320298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
DO - 10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84986320298
SN - 2325-1026
VL - 2016
JO - Elementa
JF - Elementa
M1 - e000116
ER -