Abstract
This poster describes a pilot study investigating what, if any, associative thesaural relationships are identifiable and distinguishable to information seekers. Using associative relationships from the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), we asked potential library users via Amazon Mechanical Turk to identify six narrower distinctions of established associative relationship types. Preliminary results from the survey indicate that some associative relationship types, such as near synonym and agent/process, are indeed identifiable, while others, like position in time and space, remain problematic.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Associative relationships
- LCSH
- Thesauri
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems
- Library and Information Sciences
Cite this
Can you relate? A study of user perceptions of thesaural subject relationships. / Clarke, Rachel; Lee, Jin Ha.
In: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2012.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Can you relate? A study of user perceptions of thesaural subject relationships
AU - Clarke, Rachel
AU - Lee, Jin Ha
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This poster describes a pilot study investigating what, if any, associative thesaural relationships are identifiable and distinguishable to information seekers. Using associative relationships from the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), we asked potential library users via Amazon Mechanical Turk to identify six narrower distinctions of established associative relationship types. Preliminary results from the survey indicate that some associative relationship types, such as near synonym and agent/process, are indeed identifiable, while others, like position in time and space, remain problematic.
AB - This poster describes a pilot study investigating what, if any, associative thesaural relationships are identifiable and distinguishable to information seekers. Using associative relationships from the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), we asked potential library users via Amazon Mechanical Turk to identify six narrower distinctions of established associative relationship types. Preliminary results from the survey indicate that some associative relationship types, such as near synonym and agent/process, are indeed identifiable, while others, like position in time and space, remain problematic.
KW - Associative relationships
KW - LCSH
KW - Thesauri
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878524946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878524946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/meet.14504901278
DO - 10.1002/meet.14504901278
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878524946
VL - 49
JO - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting
JF - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting
SN - 1550-8390
IS - 1
ER -