Broadening our horizons: Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research

David J. Connor, Deborah Gallagher, Beth A Ferri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-121
Number of pages15
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
methodology
Research
reflexivity
Research Design
acceptance
Research Personnel
classroom
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Broadening our horizons : Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research. / Connor, David J.; Gallagher, Deborah; Ferri, Beth A.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 107-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee43f51f216f45b4a0679ba81f9da517,
title = "Broadening our horizons: Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research",
abstract = "This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.",
author = "Connor, {David J.} and Deborah Gallagher and Ferri, {Beth A}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "107--121",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening our horizons

T2 - Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research

AU - Connor, David J.

AU - Gallagher, Deborah

AU - Ferri, Beth A

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.

AB - This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958789882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958789882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958789882

VL - 34

SP - 107

EP - 121

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 2

ER -