TY - JOUR
T1 - Broadening our horizons
T2 - Toward a plurality of methodologies in learning disability research
AU - Connor, David J.
AU - Gallagher, Deborah
AU - Ferri, Beth A.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.
AB - This article serves as an introduction to a special double issue of the Learning Disability Quarterly that seeks to engage the field in a respectful exchange about the need to expand research methodologies. In this article, we identify three interrelated concepts of interest to researchers in the field of learning disabilities (LD) - learning, disability, and research - and examine how the cultural location(s) of each serve(s) to influence decisions about and possibilities for researching learning disabilities. Subsequently, we urge greater use of a plurality of methods than is reflected in traditional LD research, sharing examples of what knowledge is currently lost, minimized, disregarded, or omitted, while articulating examples of what could be gained. Finally, by relating research on LD to schools, classroom life, and individuals identified as having learning disabilities, we advocate for more responsive research and a greater acceptance of epistemic reflexivity within the LD research community.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958789882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958789882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/073194871103400201
DO - 10.1177/073194871103400201
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79958789882
SN - 0731-9487
VL - 34
SP - 107
EP - 121
JO - Learning Disability Quarterly
JF - Learning Disability Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -