TY - JOUR
T1 - Bringing abolition in
T2 - Addressing carceral logics in social science research
AU - Davies, Elizabeth Jordie
AU - Jackson, Jenn M.
AU - Streeter, Shea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objective: In this essay, we review and offer theoretical groundings and empirical approaches to the study of abolition. Methods: We begin by demonstrating the ways police and prisons have been used to exploit and dominate marginalized people and argue that abolition offers a path to finding solutions to public safety and racial justice. We draw from black feminist and abolitionist political thought to show how abolition makes space to upend systems of power and domination and develop systems that address the root causes of violence. Results: We assert that abolitionist research will not only focus on activists’ calls for dismantling the police but will also recognize and engage with activists’ proposals for reimagining public safety. We suggest that social scientists who study abolition, American uprisings, and policing must understand the differences between transformative changes based in abolitionist frameworks versus those that center mass incarceration as a societal given and, ultimately, further reproduce the status quo. Conclusion: We conclude by suggesting that social scientists must question how researcher practices and universities uphold carceral logics and entrenched hierarchies, determining that abolitionist study will meaningfully engage with the distribution of power.
AB - Objective: In this essay, we review and offer theoretical groundings and empirical approaches to the study of abolition. Methods: We begin by demonstrating the ways police and prisons have been used to exploit and dominate marginalized people and argue that abolition offers a path to finding solutions to public safety and racial justice. We draw from black feminist and abolitionist political thought to show how abolition makes space to upend systems of power and domination and develop systems that address the root causes of violence. Results: We assert that abolitionist research will not only focus on activists’ calls for dismantling the police but will also recognize and engage with activists’ proposals for reimagining public safety. We suggest that social scientists who study abolition, American uprisings, and policing must understand the differences between transformative changes based in abolitionist frameworks versus those that center mass incarceration as a societal given and, ultimately, further reproduce the status quo. Conclusion: We conclude by suggesting that social scientists must question how researcher practices and universities uphold carceral logics and entrenched hierarchies, determining that abolitionist study will meaningfully engage with the distribution of power.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112057853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112057853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ssqu.13022
DO - 10.1111/ssqu.13022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112057853
SN - 0038-4941
VL - 102
SP - 3095
EP - 3102
JO - Social Science Quarterly
JF - Social Science Quarterly
IS - 7
ER -