TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief, cognitive-behavioral intervention to promote treatment seeking in adults with severe alcohol use disorder
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Conner, Kenneth R.
AU - Maisto, Stephen A.
AU - Abar, Beau
AU - Szafranski, Sarah
AU - Chiang, Andrew
AU - Hutchison, Morica
AU - Aldalur, Aileen
AU - Stecker, Tracy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Society for the Study of Addiction.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background and Aims: There is little RCT evidence that brief interventions improve treatment seeking in individuals with severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) or treatment seeking reduces alcohol use. The aim was to test the efficacy of a brief intervention to increase treatment seeking in treatment naïve adults with severe AUD and measure its effects on alcohol use. Design: Parallel group, non-pharmacologic RCT with intervention (n = 197) and active control (n = 203) conditions, with blinded assessors conducting follow-ups at 1, 3 and 6 months. Setting: Online recruitment in a 17-county region of upstate New York, USA. Participants: Inclusion criteria consisted of ages ≥18 years, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score ≥16, exceeds recommended limits for alcohol use and no history of AUD treatment. n = 400; 50% female; 79% white; mean age, 40.7; mean education, 14.6 years. Intervention and comparator: One-session telephone-delivered interventions: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Treatment Seeking (CBT-TS; intervention), review of a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism pamphlet on AUD treatment (control). Measurements: Self-report of any AUD treatment use over 3 months (primary outcome) and two standard measures of alcohol use over 6 months (secondary outcomes). Findings: Intent-to-treat analyses were used. Assessment follow-up rates were ≥93%. Any alcohol-related treatment use over 3-month follow-up was obtained by 38 (19%) intervention participants and 36 (18%) control participants, a non-significant difference, χ2 [1] = 0.16, P = 0.689. Secondary analysis showed a significant interaction term between sex and intervention assignment (β = −1.197, P = 0.027). The interaction suggested CBT-TS was effective in men (22% vs 13%), although the evidence was somewhat weak (P = 0.071), and it was not effective in women (17% vs 24%). Conclusions: A one-session cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention to increase treatment seeking in treatment naïve adults with severe alcohol use disorder did not increase treatment seeking.
AB - Background and Aims: There is little RCT evidence that brief interventions improve treatment seeking in individuals with severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) or treatment seeking reduces alcohol use. The aim was to test the efficacy of a brief intervention to increase treatment seeking in treatment naïve adults with severe AUD and measure its effects on alcohol use. Design: Parallel group, non-pharmacologic RCT with intervention (n = 197) and active control (n = 203) conditions, with blinded assessors conducting follow-ups at 1, 3 and 6 months. Setting: Online recruitment in a 17-county region of upstate New York, USA. Participants: Inclusion criteria consisted of ages ≥18 years, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score ≥16, exceeds recommended limits for alcohol use and no history of AUD treatment. n = 400; 50% female; 79% white; mean age, 40.7; mean education, 14.6 years. Intervention and comparator: One-session telephone-delivered interventions: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Treatment Seeking (CBT-TS; intervention), review of a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism pamphlet on AUD treatment (control). Measurements: Self-report of any AUD treatment use over 3 months (primary outcome) and two standard measures of alcohol use over 6 months (secondary outcomes). Findings: Intent-to-treat analyses were used. Assessment follow-up rates were ≥93%. Any alcohol-related treatment use over 3-month follow-up was obtained by 38 (19%) intervention participants and 36 (18%) control participants, a non-significant difference, χ2 [1] = 0.16, P = 0.689. Secondary analysis showed a significant interaction term between sex and intervention assignment (β = −1.197, P = 0.027). The interaction suggested CBT-TS was effective in men (22% vs 13%), although the evidence was somewhat weak (P = 0.071), and it was not effective in women (17% vs 24%). Conclusions: A one-session cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention to increase treatment seeking in treatment naïve adults with severe alcohol use disorder did not increase treatment seeking.
KW - SBIRT
KW - alcohol use disorder
KW - brief intervention
KW - cognitive behavioral treatment
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - treatment seeking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165571986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165571986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/add.16300
DO - 10.1111/add.16300
M3 - Article
C2 - 37488997
AN - SCOPUS:85165571986
SN - 0965-2140
VL - 118
SP - 2342
EP - 2351
JO - Addiction
JF - Addiction
IS - 12
ER -