Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Syracuse Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Equipment
Grants
Activities
Press and Media
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting
Sarah B. Pralle
Department of Political Science
Research output
:
Book/Report/Essay
›
Book
154
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Advocacy Groups
33%
Agenda Setting
100%
Austria
33%
British Columbia
66%
Canada
33%
Canadian History
33%
Civil Disobedience
33%
Clayoquot Sound
100%
Collaborative Conservation
33%
Conflict Management
33%
Conservation Approaches
33%
Containment
33%
Digging
100%
Environmental Advocacy
100%
Environmental Agenda
100%
Environmental Conflict
33%
Environmental Organizations
33%
Environmentalists
33%
Forest Company
33%
Forest Policy
66%
Forest Politics
33%
Germany
33%
Governmental Organizations
33%
Japan
33%
Levels of Government
33%
Local Residents
33%
Most Significant Change
33%
Nimble
33%
Northern California
66%
Old-growth Forest
66%
Policy Process
33%
Political Actors
66%
Political Conflict
33%
Posters
33%
Public Lands
33%
Sierra Nevada Mountains
33%
Stakeholder Collaboration
33%
Stakeholder Negotiation
33%
Timber Companies
66%
Time Flexibility
33%
United States
66%
Arts and Humanities
Action
33%
Agenda setting
100%
Austria
33%
British Columbia
66%
California
100%
Canada
33%
Canadian History
33%
Collaborative
33%
Conflict Management
33%
Disobedience
33%
England
33%
Environmental conflict
33%
Episode
33%
Forest Policy
66%
GaIN
33%
Germany
33%
Japan
33%
Local
66%
Policy Process
33%
Public Lands
33%
Sierra Nevada
33%
Sound
100%
Timing
33%
Social Sciences
Advocacy
100%
Austria
50%
Canada
50%
Civil Disobedience
50%
Conflict Management
50%
Courts
50%
Forest Growth
100%
Germany
50%
Japan
50%
Policy Process
50%
Political Actor
100%
Political Conflict
50%
UK
50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Austria
33%
British Columbia
66%
California
100%
Canada
33%
Conflict Management
33%
England
33%
Forest Policy
66%
Germany
33%
Japan
33%
Nevada
33%
Old-Growth Forest
66%
Political Conflict
33%
United States
66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Canadians
50%
Conflict Management
50%
Forest Policy
100%
Old-Growth Forest
100%
Public Lands
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Political Conflict
100%