Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation

Pamela R. Bennett, Amy C. Lutz, Lakshmi Jayaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Scopus citations

Abstract

We investigate class differences in youth activity participation with interview, survey, and archival data from a diverse sample of parents (n = 51) in two schools. Findings point toward structural rather than cultural explanations. Working-and middle-class parents overlap in parenting logics about participation, though differ in one respect: middle-class parents are concerned with customizing children's involvement in activities, while working-class parents are concerned with ensuring safety and social mobility for children through participation. Like financial constraints among the working class, social institutions are implicated in class differences. Schools act as an equalizing institution by offering low-cost activities; yet, contribute to class differences by offering different activities to working-and middle-class youth. Opportunities for working-class youth to participate in non-school activities are few due to the scarcity of community organizations in their neighborhood, while middle-class families are heavily involved in out-of-school activities. We explore the implications of our findings for educational stratification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-157
Number of pages27
JournalSociology of Education
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Keywords

  • adolescents
  • college
  • extracurricular activities
  • families
  • leisure activities
  • neighborhoods
  • organized activities
  • schools
  • youth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this