Beyond the far too incessant schism: Special education and the social model of disability

Deborah J. Gallagher, David J. Connor, Beth A Ferri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Special education critics' vigorous appraisals of the social model of disability, along with their analysis of its implications for special education, provide a valuable forum for meaningful dialogue about how educators are to understand the nature of disability. In this article, we offer our response to their recent articles. As advocates of the social model, we find their critiques intriguing, at moments a bit provocative, but more importantly we find in their work an opportunity to advance beyond the far too incessant schism between those who support the medical model of disability and those who endorse its alternatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1120-1142
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Inclusive Education
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

special education
disability
critic
dialogue
educator
Social Model
Schism
Special Education
Medical Model
Educators

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Inclusive education
  • Special education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Beyond the far too incessant schism : Special education and the social model of disability. / Gallagher, Deborah J.; Connor, David J.; Ferri, Beth A.

In: International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 18, No. 11, 2014, p. 1120-1142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{efbbf612a20e4acf8e6df9f482bb3ce7,
title = "Beyond the far too incessant schism: Special education and the social model of disability",
abstract = "Special education critics' vigorous appraisals of the social model of disability, along with their analysis of its implications for special education, provide a valuable forum for meaningful dialogue about how educators are to understand the nature of disability. In this article, we offer our response to their recent articles. As advocates of the social model, we find their critiques intriguing, at moments a bit provocative, but more importantly we find in their work an opportunity to advance beyond the far too incessant schism between those who support the medical model of disability and those who endorse its alternatives.",
keywords = "Disability, Inclusive education, Special education",
author = "Gallagher, {Deborah J.} and Connor, {David J.} and Ferri, {Beth A}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/13603116.2013.875599",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1120--1142",
journal = "International Journal of Inclusive Education",
issn = "1360-3116",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the far too incessant schism

T2 - Special education and the social model of disability

AU - Gallagher, Deborah J.

AU - Connor, David J.

AU - Ferri, Beth A

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Special education critics' vigorous appraisals of the social model of disability, along with their analysis of its implications for special education, provide a valuable forum for meaningful dialogue about how educators are to understand the nature of disability. In this article, we offer our response to their recent articles. As advocates of the social model, we find their critiques intriguing, at moments a bit provocative, but more importantly we find in their work an opportunity to advance beyond the far too incessant schism between those who support the medical model of disability and those who endorse its alternatives.

AB - Special education critics' vigorous appraisals of the social model of disability, along with their analysis of its implications for special education, provide a valuable forum for meaningful dialogue about how educators are to understand the nature of disability. In this article, we offer our response to their recent articles. As advocates of the social model, we find their critiques intriguing, at moments a bit provocative, but more importantly we find in their work an opportunity to advance beyond the far too incessant schism between those who support the medical model of disability and those who endorse its alternatives.

KW - Disability

KW - Inclusive education

KW - Special education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916200169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916200169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13603116.2013.875599

DO - 10.1080/13603116.2013.875599

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84916200169

VL - 18

SP - 1120

EP - 1142

JO - International Journal of Inclusive Education

JF - International Journal of Inclusive Education

SN - 1360-3116

IS - 11

ER -