TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond familialism
T2 - Recalibrating family, state and market in Southern Europe and East Asia
AU - Estévez-Abe, Margarita
AU - Yang, Jae Jin
AU - Choi, Young Jun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - This Special Issue takes on a new cross-regional comparison between Southern Europe and East Asia in an attempt to identify ‘new politics’ of welfare state adjustments. Departing from the previous literature that overemphasized regional peculiarities of East Asian and Southern European welfare states, our Special Issue highlights family resemblances – among Italy, Japan, Korea and Spain. We argue that these four welfare states – often labelled as ‘familialist’ – share key common characteristics, which in turn experienced very similar policy problems in recent years. Interestingly, despite their initial similarities, these four countries have been trying to cope with new policy problems in different ways. In this process, some are clearly becoming less familialist. The main aim of this introductory article is to demonstrate the theoretical advantages based on the new cross-regional comparison. This article proceeds in three steps. First, it establishes the usefulness of the concept of family resemblances in our cross-regional comparison. Second, it presents a brief historical account of recent policy differences across the four countries going beyond familialism and shows that the existing theories fail to account for the new divergences. Third, it provides the overview of the Special Issue by explaining the research puzzles each paper tackles. We argue that these four welfare states, which are moving beyond familialism to varying degrees, represent heuristically helpful cases to explore the effects of both domestic and international political factors.
AB - This Special Issue takes on a new cross-regional comparison between Southern Europe and East Asia in an attempt to identify ‘new politics’ of welfare state adjustments. Departing from the previous literature that overemphasized regional peculiarities of East Asian and Southern European welfare states, our Special Issue highlights family resemblances – among Italy, Japan, Korea and Spain. We argue that these four welfare states – often labelled as ‘familialist’ – share key common characteristics, which in turn experienced very similar policy problems in recent years. Interestingly, despite their initial similarities, these four countries have been trying to cope with new policy problems in different ways. In this process, some are clearly becoming less familialist. The main aim of this introductory article is to demonstrate the theoretical advantages based on the new cross-regional comparison. This article proceeds in three steps. First, it establishes the usefulness of the concept of family resemblances in our cross-regional comparison. Second, it presents a brief historical account of recent policy differences across the four countries going beyond familialism and shows that the existing theories fail to account for the new divergences. Third, it provides the overview of the Special Issue by explaining the research puzzles each paper tackles. We argue that these four welfare states, which are moving beyond familialism to varying degrees, represent heuristically helpful cases to explore the effects of both domestic and international political factors.
KW - East Asia
KW - Southern Europe
KW - familialism
KW - welfare reform
KW - welfare state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992151509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992151509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0958928716657274
DO - 10.1177/0958928716657274
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:84992151509
SN - 0958-9287
VL - 26
SP - 301
EP - 313
JO - Journal of European Social Policy
JF - Journal of European Social Policy
IS - 4
ER -