TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond backlash
T2 - Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights
AU - Keck, Thomas M.
PY - 2009/3
Y1 - 2009/3
N2 - This article evaluates the widespread scholarly claim that the courtroom victories of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights movement have invariably provoked a counterproductive political backlash. Those victories have indeed provoked conservative countermobilization, but that has not been their only or even their most prominent effect. Assessing the political reaction to the movement's judicial victories, the policy impact of those victories, and the alternative strategic paths that were available to the movement at the outset, I argue that here, as elsewhere, legal mobilization has sometimes been a promising avenue for pursuing policy changes whose prospects were otherwise quite limited.
AB - This article evaluates the widespread scholarly claim that the courtroom victories of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights movement have invariably provoked a counterproductive political backlash. Those victories have indeed provoked conservative countermobilization, but that has not been their only or even their most prominent effect. Assessing the political reaction to the movement's judicial victories, the policy impact of those victories, and the alternative strategic paths that were available to the movement at the outset, I argue that here, as elsewhere, legal mobilization has sometimes been a promising avenue for pursuing policy changes whose prospects were otherwise quite limited.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649129083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649129083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00370.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00370.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:62649129083
SN - 0023-9216
VL - 43
SP - 151
EP - 186
JO - Law and Society Review
JF - Law and Society Review
IS - 1
ER -