Between Eurocentrism and Babel: A framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders

Charles R. Butcher, Ryan Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mindful of the growing interest in non-Western and pre-modern political systems, we propose a framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. We provide a culturally neutral definition of the state and outline a method for assessing variation in political organization both within and above the state. Our framework cleanly delineates hierarchy from anarchy and can be applied to a diverse set of state systems. We then show how the content of international order inter-relates with system structure and the local density (interaction capacity) of a region. We argue that our framework captures similarities-and exposes differences-between different systems and orders over time and space. It strikes a balance between the traditional focus on the Western experience and the current trend toward regional studies in which it is difficult to accumulate knowledge in a rigorous manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-336
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eurocentrism
anarchy
system structure
political system
geography
organization
trend
interaction
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Between Eurocentrism and Babel : A framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. / Butcher, Charles R.; Griffiths, Ryan.

In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 328-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee57c2aa4ca945ad9a163e74cfcd616d,
title = "Between Eurocentrism and Babel: A framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders",
abstract = "Mindful of the growing interest in non-Western and pre-modern political systems, we propose a framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. We provide a culturally neutral definition of the state and outline a method for assessing variation in political organization both within and above the state. Our framework cleanly delineates hierarchy from anarchy and can be applied to a diverse set of state systems. We then show how the content of international order inter-relates with system structure and the local density (interaction capacity) of a region. We argue that our framework captures similarities-and exposes differences-between different systems and orders over time and space. It strikes a balance between the traditional focus on the Western experience and the current trend toward regional studies in which it is difficult to accumulate knowledge in a rigorous manner.",
author = "Butcher, {Charles R.} and Ryan Griffiths",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/isq/sqw057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "328--336",
journal = "International Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0020-8833",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Eurocentrism and Babel

T2 - A framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders

AU - Butcher, Charles R.

AU - Griffiths, Ryan

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Mindful of the growing interest in non-Western and pre-modern political systems, we propose a framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. We provide a culturally neutral definition of the state and outline a method for assessing variation in political organization both within and above the state. Our framework cleanly delineates hierarchy from anarchy and can be applied to a diverse set of state systems. We then show how the content of international order inter-relates with system structure and the local density (interaction capacity) of a region. We argue that our framework captures similarities-and exposes differences-between different systems and orders over time and space. It strikes a balance between the traditional focus on the Western experience and the current trend toward regional studies in which it is difficult to accumulate knowledge in a rigorous manner.

AB - Mindful of the growing interest in non-Western and pre-modern political systems, we propose a framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. We provide a culturally neutral definition of the state and outline a method for assessing variation in political organization both within and above the state. Our framework cleanly delineates hierarchy from anarchy and can be applied to a diverse set of state systems. We then show how the content of international order inter-relates with system structure and the local density (interaction capacity) of a region. We argue that our framework captures similarities-and exposes differences-between different systems and orders over time and space. It strikes a balance between the traditional focus on the Western experience and the current trend toward regional studies in which it is difficult to accumulate knowledge in a rigorous manner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031940424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031940424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/isq/sqw057

DO - 10.1093/isq/sqw057

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031940424

VL - 61

SP - 328

EP - 336

JO - International Studies Quarterly

JF - International Studies Quarterly

SN - 0020-8833

IS - 2

ER -