@inproceedings{98e6e66544924032af35bffe0ff58ffa,
title = "Assumption Violations in Forced-Choice Recognition Judgments: Implications from the Area Theorem",
abstract = "Trials in a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) recognition-memory task require individuals to choose the stimulus in a pair that they deem as having been previously studied. Because of the relative nature of the judgments made, 2AFC trials are typically considered to be free from response biases concerning the old/new status of stimuli. Recent studies have suggested that this assumption is incorrect, and individuals often resort to single-stimulus old-new (ON) judgments instead. The present study tests this claim by joint modeling 2AFC and ON judgments using extended SDT models that include the possibility of ON contamination. Results show that the relative-judgment assumption provides an excellent account of the data, providing no support for the notion of ON contamination in typical experimental designs.",
keywords = "Recognition memory, bias, forced choice, mixture, signal detection",
author = "David Kellen and Henrik Singmann and Sharon Chen and Samuel Winiger",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2018. All rights reserved.; 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Changing Minds, CogSci 2018 ; Conference date: 25-07-2018 Through 28-07-2018",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2018",
publisher = "The Cognitive Science Society",
pages = "596--601",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2018",
}