Argon diffusion in Apollo 16 impact glass spherules: Implications for 40Ar/39Ar dating of lunar impact events

David J. Gombosi, Suzanne L. Baldwin, E. Bruce Watson, Timothy D. Swindle, John W. Delano, Wayne G. Roberge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

The 40Ar/39Ar technique applied to impact glass has been used to date both terrestrial and lunar impact events. The ability to utilize the 40Ar/39Ar technique rests on the assumption that impact glasses are closed to the loss of daughter product, 40Ar*, after formation. Diffusion experiments were performed on three Apollo 16 lunar impact glasses and yielded activation energies for 39Ar of ~17 to 20kcalmol-1 and log10(D0/a2) values of -5.2 to -6.0 s-1. The resulting diffusion coefficients are interpreted as minimum values and the Apollo 16 glass is probably some of the least retentive of lunar glasses, as the degree of non-bridging oxygen is at one end of the range in lunar glasses. At temperatures below the glass transition temperature (i.e., ~660°C), the data can be explained by volume diffusion from a single diffusion domain. Modeling shows that Apollo 16 composition glass could lose significant quantities of radiogenic argon (40Ar*) (~90-100% over 20-40Myr assuming a diffusion domain size (a) of 75μm) due to diurnal temperature variations on the lunar surface, although 40Ar* loss is highly sensitive to exposure duration and effective diffusion domain size. Modeling shows that loss from transient thermal events (e.g., heating to ~200°C for 102yr duration) can also cause partial resetting of apparent 40Ar/39Ar ages. In small (a=75μm) glasses a maximum of 50-60% of 40Ar* is lost over 4Ga when buried to depths corresponding to temperatures of -15°C. Results indicate that caution should be exercised in interpreting lunar impact glass 40Ar/39Ar ages, as the assumption of closed system behavior may have been violated, particularly in glasses with low fractions of non-bridging oxygen.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages251-268
Number of pages18
JournalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume148
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

spherule
Argon
argon
glass
Glass
dating
Oxygen
temperature
argon isotope
oxygen
resetting
Temperature
activation energy
modeling
Activation energy
Heating
heating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Argon diffusion in Apollo 16 impact glass spherules : Implications for 40Ar/39Ar dating of lunar impact events. / Gombosi, David J.; Baldwin, Suzanne L.; Watson, E. Bruce; Swindle, Timothy D.; Delano, John W.; Roberge, Wayne G.

In: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 148, 01.01.2015, p. 251-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gombosi, David J. ; Baldwin, Suzanne L. ; Watson, E. Bruce ; Swindle, Timothy D. ; Delano, John W. ; Roberge, Wayne G./ Argon diffusion in Apollo 16 impact glass spherules : Implications for 40Ar/39Ar dating of lunar impact events. In: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2015 ; Vol. 148. pp. 251-268
@article{b44e197f4dc644e4be902660128f0605,
title = "Argon diffusion in Apollo 16 impact glass spherules: Implications for 40Ar/39Ar dating of lunar impact events",
abstract = "The 40Ar/39Ar technique applied to impact glass has been used to date both terrestrial and lunar impact events. The ability to utilize the 40Ar/39Ar technique rests on the assumption that impact glasses are closed to the loss of daughter product, 40Ar*, after formation. Diffusion experiments were performed on three Apollo 16 lunar impact glasses and yielded activation energies for 39Ar of ~17 to 20kcalmol-1 and log10(D0/a2) values of -5.2 to -6.0 s-1. The resulting diffusion coefficients are interpreted as minimum values and the Apollo 16 glass is probably some of the least retentive of lunar glasses, as the degree of non-bridging oxygen is at one end of the range in lunar glasses. At temperatures below the glass transition temperature (i.e., ~660°C), the data can be explained by volume diffusion from a single diffusion domain. Modeling shows that Apollo 16 composition glass could lose significant quantities of radiogenic argon (40Ar*) (~90-100{\%} over 20-40Myr assuming a diffusion domain size (a) of 75μm) due to diurnal temperature variations on the lunar surface, although 40Ar* loss is highly sensitive to exposure duration and effective diffusion domain size. Modeling shows that loss from transient thermal events (e.g., heating to ~200°C for 102yr duration) can also cause partial resetting of apparent 40Ar/39Ar ages. In small (a=75μm) glasses a maximum of 50-60{\%} of 40Ar* is lost over 4Ga when buried to depths corresponding to temperatures of -15°C. Results indicate that caution should be exercised in interpreting lunar impact glass 40Ar/39Ar ages, as the assumption of closed system behavior may have been violated, particularly in glasses with low fractions of non-bridging oxygen.",
author = "Gombosi, {David J.} and Baldwin, {Suzanne L.} and Watson, {E. Bruce} and Swindle, {Timothy D.} and Delano, {John W.} and Roberge, {Wayne G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "251--268",
journal = "Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta",
issn = "0016-7037",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Argon diffusion in Apollo 16 impact glass spherules

T2 - Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta

AU - Gombosi,David J.

AU - Baldwin,Suzanne L.

AU - Watson,E. Bruce

AU - Swindle,Timothy D.

AU - Delano,John W.

AU - Roberge,Wayne G.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The 40Ar/39Ar technique applied to impact glass has been used to date both terrestrial and lunar impact events. The ability to utilize the 40Ar/39Ar technique rests on the assumption that impact glasses are closed to the loss of daughter product, 40Ar*, after formation. Diffusion experiments were performed on three Apollo 16 lunar impact glasses and yielded activation energies for 39Ar of ~17 to 20kcalmol-1 and log10(D0/a2) values of -5.2 to -6.0 s-1. The resulting diffusion coefficients are interpreted as minimum values and the Apollo 16 glass is probably some of the least retentive of lunar glasses, as the degree of non-bridging oxygen is at one end of the range in lunar glasses. At temperatures below the glass transition temperature (i.e., ~660°C), the data can be explained by volume diffusion from a single diffusion domain. Modeling shows that Apollo 16 composition glass could lose significant quantities of radiogenic argon (40Ar*) (~90-100% over 20-40Myr assuming a diffusion domain size (a) of 75μm) due to diurnal temperature variations on the lunar surface, although 40Ar* loss is highly sensitive to exposure duration and effective diffusion domain size. Modeling shows that loss from transient thermal events (e.g., heating to ~200°C for 102yr duration) can also cause partial resetting of apparent 40Ar/39Ar ages. In small (a=75μm) glasses a maximum of 50-60% of 40Ar* is lost over 4Ga when buried to depths corresponding to temperatures of -15°C. Results indicate that caution should be exercised in interpreting lunar impact glass 40Ar/39Ar ages, as the assumption of closed system behavior may have been violated, particularly in glasses with low fractions of non-bridging oxygen.

AB - The 40Ar/39Ar technique applied to impact glass has been used to date both terrestrial and lunar impact events. The ability to utilize the 40Ar/39Ar technique rests on the assumption that impact glasses are closed to the loss of daughter product, 40Ar*, after formation. Diffusion experiments were performed on three Apollo 16 lunar impact glasses and yielded activation energies for 39Ar of ~17 to 20kcalmol-1 and log10(D0/a2) values of -5.2 to -6.0 s-1. The resulting diffusion coefficients are interpreted as minimum values and the Apollo 16 glass is probably some of the least retentive of lunar glasses, as the degree of non-bridging oxygen is at one end of the range in lunar glasses. At temperatures below the glass transition temperature (i.e., ~660°C), the data can be explained by volume diffusion from a single diffusion domain. Modeling shows that Apollo 16 composition glass could lose significant quantities of radiogenic argon (40Ar*) (~90-100% over 20-40Myr assuming a diffusion domain size (a) of 75μm) due to diurnal temperature variations on the lunar surface, although 40Ar* loss is highly sensitive to exposure duration and effective diffusion domain size. Modeling shows that loss from transient thermal events (e.g., heating to ~200°C for 102yr duration) can also cause partial resetting of apparent 40Ar/39Ar ages. In small (a=75μm) glasses a maximum of 50-60% of 40Ar* is lost over 4Ga when buried to depths corresponding to temperatures of -15°C. Results indicate that caution should be exercised in interpreting lunar impact glass 40Ar/39Ar ages, as the assumption of closed system behavior may have been violated, particularly in glasses with low fractions of non-bridging oxygen.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918579439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918579439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.031

DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.031

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 251

EP - 268

JO - Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta

JF - Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta

SN - 0016-7037

ER -