TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying multispectral UAV imagery to delineate in and near stream cover along a small urban stream
AU - Sessanna, Riley
AU - Iavorivska, Lidiia
AU - Kelleher, Christa
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge Ian Joyce, who conducted all flights. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DGE‐1449617 and Grant No. SBE‐1444755 and a CUSE Award to C. Kelleher. The authors would also like to thank Antoin O'Sullivan and another anonymous reviewer, whose thoughtful comments and critiques have motivated revision and improvement of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Traditional remote sensing methods are rarely applied to headwater streams because of a mismatch in spatial scale. With improved technology, remote sensing using unoccupied aerial vehicles enables imagery to be collected at high spatial and temporal resolution. However, these innovations have been used less frequently to detect changes within the water column. In addition, it is unclear whether classification methods developed along a single reach can be transferred through space (to other reaches) and through time, or how much information is needed to perform such classifications. This study combines methods of remote sensing, image processing, and machine learning to classify land cover and submerged aquatic vegetation along four urban stream reaches (170–325 m). A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model was developed to provide land and water cover classification maps using training data. This method proved to be robust when classifying land cover along a single reach with minimal training data required. Using 200 pixels per land cover class resulted in 100% classification confidence for more than 93% of the pixels; when reducing this to only 50 pixels per land cover class, LDA yielded 100% classification confidence for nearly 80% of the total pixels. Through attempts to transfer relationships across reaches and flight dates, we found a greater percentage of misclassified pixels (upwards of 45% misclassification for flights on one date) when classifying across reaches on a single date as opposed to classification along a single reach for multiple dates. Overall, we recommend passive optical approaches, like the one used here, consider lighting conditions, reach orientation, and shading in data acquisition planning to mitigate the uncertainty they may introduce in delineating water column quality and cover.
AB - Traditional remote sensing methods are rarely applied to headwater streams because of a mismatch in spatial scale. With improved technology, remote sensing using unoccupied aerial vehicles enables imagery to be collected at high spatial and temporal resolution. However, these innovations have been used less frequently to detect changes within the water column. In addition, it is unclear whether classification methods developed along a single reach can be transferred through space (to other reaches) and through time, or how much information is needed to perform such classifications. This study combines methods of remote sensing, image processing, and machine learning to classify land cover and submerged aquatic vegetation along four urban stream reaches (170–325 m). A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model was developed to provide land and water cover classification maps using training data. This method proved to be robust when classifying land cover along a single reach with minimal training data required. Using 200 pixels per land cover class resulted in 100% classification confidence for more than 93% of the pixels; when reducing this to only 50 pixels per land cover class, LDA yielded 100% classification confidence for nearly 80% of the total pixels. Through attempts to transfer relationships across reaches and flight dates, we found a greater percentage of misclassified pixels (upwards of 45% misclassification for flights on one date) when classifying across reaches on a single date as opposed to classification along a single reach for multiple dates. Overall, we recommend passive optical approaches, like the one used here, consider lighting conditions, reach orientation, and shading in data acquisition planning to mitigate the uncertainty they may introduce in delineating water column quality and cover.
KW - headwater stream
KW - land cover classification
KW - linear discriminant analysis
KW - shallow rivers
KW - submerged aquatic vegetation
KW - unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAV)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122898072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122898072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rra.3931
DO - 10.1002/rra.3931
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122898072
SN - 1535-1459
VL - 38
SP - 717
EP - 726
JO - River Research and Applications
JF - River Research and Applications
IS - 4
ER -