TY - JOUR
T1 - Anna Julia Cooper, Archival Absences, and Black Women's “muffled” Knowledge
AU - May, Vivian M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 University of Tulsa. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Calling for scholars of the archive's raced-gendered politics to attend to Anna Julia Cooper's work, this article examines how Cooper, as a Black feminist scholar, reads archival contents (and gaps) against the grain, pivots toward evidence excluded from prevailing frameworks, and lays the ground for counternarratives in her two major texts: A Voice from the South by a Black Woman of the South (1892) and her 1925 Sorbonne dissertation on the French and Haitian revolutions. The legacies of exclusion Cooper underscored and the interpretive tactics she devised to combat erasure and violation, especially the “unwritten history” of Black women's lives, are significant and should be engaged with by contemporary scholars of the archive. The article concludes by exploring the limits of recovery work and confronts a painful paradox we must wrestle with: many of the mindsets Cooper fought against live on and continue to stifle her voice. The act of Cooper's work being backgrounded in her own time and the ways in which her work is (and is not) taken up today call to mind the “muffling” of Black women's ideas that Cooper challenged in 1892.
AB - Calling for scholars of the archive's raced-gendered politics to attend to Anna Julia Cooper's work, this article examines how Cooper, as a Black feminist scholar, reads archival contents (and gaps) against the grain, pivots toward evidence excluded from prevailing frameworks, and lays the ground for counternarratives in her two major texts: A Voice from the South by a Black Woman of the South (1892) and her 1925 Sorbonne dissertation on the French and Haitian revolutions. The legacies of exclusion Cooper underscored and the interpretive tactics she devised to combat erasure and violation, especially the “unwritten history” of Black women's lives, are significant and should be engaged with by contemporary scholars of the archive. The article concludes by exploring the limits of recovery work and confronts a painful paradox we must wrestle with: many of the mindsets Cooper fought against live on and continue to stifle her voice. The act of Cooper's work being backgrounded in her own time and the ways in which her work is (and is not) taken up today call to mind the “muffling” of Black women's ideas that Cooper challenged in 1892.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121982120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121982120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/tsw.2021.0022
DO - 10.1353/tsw.2021.0022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121982120
SN - 0732-7730
VL - 40
SP - 241
EP - 272
JO - Tulsa Studies in Womens Literature
JF - Tulsa Studies in Womens Literature
IS - 2
ER -