TY - GEN
T1 - Analysis of GMGW-1 structured grids
AU - Dannenhoffer, John F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In 2017, the AIAA conducted its inaugural Geometry and Mesh Generation Workshop (GMGW-1), in conjunction with its High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HiLiftPW-3). For the meshing workshop, several researchers generated one or more meshes, where desired mesh characteristics were specified by the organizers of the HiLiftPW-3 workshop. Presented here is an assessment as to the degree to which the structured mesh systems adhered to the meshing guidelines. The primary assessment for each mesh was a validity check, specifically ensuring that the surface mesh points actually lie on the configuration, that all parts of the configuration were covered by a portion of a surface mesh, and that all mesh blocks shared common boundaries, thereby precluding holes in the field. The secondary assessment checked for mesh quality. These assessments were performed on all block-structured and structured-overset mesh systems. Overall, all submitted structured meshes were found to be valid and of generally high quality. The techniques employed here, which are freely available, are suitable not only for evaluating HiLiftPW-3 meshes, but also suitable for any future AIAA Workshop for which computational meshes are published.
AB - In 2017, the AIAA conducted its inaugural Geometry and Mesh Generation Workshop (GMGW-1), in conjunction with its High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HiLiftPW-3). For the meshing workshop, several researchers generated one or more meshes, where desired mesh characteristics were specified by the organizers of the HiLiftPW-3 workshop. Presented here is an assessment as to the degree to which the structured mesh systems adhered to the meshing guidelines. The primary assessment for each mesh was a validity check, specifically ensuring that the surface mesh points actually lie on the configuration, that all parts of the configuration were covered by a portion of a surface mesh, and that all mesh blocks shared common boundaries, thereby precluding holes in the field. The secondary assessment checked for mesh quality. These assessments were performed on all block-structured and structured-overset mesh systems. Overall, all submitted structured meshes were found to be valid and of generally high quality. The techniques employed here, which are freely available, are suitable not only for evaluating HiLiftPW-3 meshes, but also suitable for any future AIAA Workshop for which computational meshes are published.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141562975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141562975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2018-0131
DO - 10.2514/6.2018-0131
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85141562975
SN - 9781624105241
T3 - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018
BT - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018
Y2 - 8 January 2018 through 12 January 2018
ER -