An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior

Michael Sheeley, Dawit Negussey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Use of EPS (expanded polystyrene) geofoam as an ultra lightweight fill for construction over areas of soft ground has increased in recent years. An investigation of the interface friction between geofoam and construction materials that are commonly used with geofoam are presented in this paper. The interfaces studied included geofoam to geofoam, in dry and wet conditions. Geofoam to cast in place concrete as well as geofoam to geomembrane interfaces were also tested. Interface strengths between geofoam and HDPE as well as PVC geomembranes were determined. The effect of geofoam surface degradation due to extended exposure to sunlight on interface strength and adhesion bonding with cast in place were evaluated using field samples and samples degraded by accelerated weathering in the laboratory. The results indicate material density; sample size, stress level and surface moisture do not have significant influence on geofoam to geofoam interface strengths. A strong adhesion bond developed between geofoam and cast in place concrete. Both the peak and residual strength for geofoam and cast in place concrete surfaces were much greater than for geofoam to geofoam interfaces. Degradation due to exposure to sunlight and accelerated weathering in the laboratory reduced the strength of adhesion bonding between geofoam and cast in place concrete. The interface strength between geofoam and geomembranes was found to be much lower than any of the geofoam interfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeotechnical Special Publication
Pages292-303
Number of pages12
Volume112
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Cast in place concrete
Geomembranes
adhesion
weathering
Adhesion
solar radiation
Weathering
geomembrane
degradation
polystyrenes
friction
sampling
Degradation
High density polyethylenes
Polyvinyl chlorides
Polystyrenes
Moisture
Friction
residual strength
fill

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science
  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture

Cite this

Sheeley, M., & Negussey, D. (2001). An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior. In Geotechnical Special Publication (Vol. 112, pp. 292-303)

An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior. / Sheeley, Michael; Negussey, Dawit.

Geotechnical Special Publication. Vol. 112 2001. p. 292-303.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Sheeley, M & Negussey, D 2001, An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior. in Geotechnical Special Publication. vol. 112, pp. 292-303.
Sheeley M, Negussey D. An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior. In Geotechnical Special Publication. Vol. 112. 2001. p. 292-303
Sheeley, Michael ; Negussey, Dawit. / An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior. Geotechnical Special Publication. Vol. 112 2001. pp. 292-303
@inbook{e6f1c19fcb484ba5b5a83842730ab7cb,
title = "An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior",
abstract = "Use of EPS (expanded polystyrene) geofoam as an ultra lightweight fill for construction over areas of soft ground has increased in recent years. An investigation of the interface friction between geofoam and construction materials that are commonly used with geofoam are presented in this paper. The interfaces studied included geofoam to geofoam, in dry and wet conditions. Geofoam to cast in place concrete as well as geofoam to geomembrane interfaces were also tested. Interface strengths between geofoam and HDPE as well as PVC geomembranes were determined. The effect of geofoam surface degradation due to extended exposure to sunlight on interface strength and adhesion bonding with cast in place were evaluated using field samples and samples degraded by accelerated weathering in the laboratory. The results indicate material density; sample size, stress level and surface moisture do not have significant influence on geofoam to geofoam interface strengths. A strong adhesion bond developed between geofoam and cast in place concrete. Both the peak and residual strength for geofoam and cast in place concrete surfaces were much greater than for geofoam to geofoam interfaces. Degradation due to exposure to sunlight and accelerated weathering in the laboratory reduced the strength of adhesion bonding between geofoam and cast in place concrete. The interface strength between geofoam and geomembranes was found to be much lower than any of the geofoam interfaces.",
author = "Michael Sheeley and Dawit Negussey",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "292--303",
booktitle = "Geotechnical Special Publication",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - An investigation of gcofoam interface strength behavior

AU - Sheeley, Michael

AU - Negussey, Dawit

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Use of EPS (expanded polystyrene) geofoam as an ultra lightweight fill for construction over areas of soft ground has increased in recent years. An investigation of the interface friction between geofoam and construction materials that are commonly used with geofoam are presented in this paper. The interfaces studied included geofoam to geofoam, in dry and wet conditions. Geofoam to cast in place concrete as well as geofoam to geomembrane interfaces were also tested. Interface strengths between geofoam and HDPE as well as PVC geomembranes were determined. The effect of geofoam surface degradation due to extended exposure to sunlight on interface strength and adhesion bonding with cast in place were evaluated using field samples and samples degraded by accelerated weathering in the laboratory. The results indicate material density; sample size, stress level and surface moisture do not have significant influence on geofoam to geofoam interface strengths. A strong adhesion bond developed between geofoam and cast in place concrete. Both the peak and residual strength for geofoam and cast in place concrete surfaces were much greater than for geofoam to geofoam interfaces. Degradation due to exposure to sunlight and accelerated weathering in the laboratory reduced the strength of adhesion bonding between geofoam and cast in place concrete. The interface strength between geofoam and geomembranes was found to be much lower than any of the geofoam interfaces.

AB - Use of EPS (expanded polystyrene) geofoam as an ultra lightweight fill for construction over areas of soft ground has increased in recent years. An investigation of the interface friction between geofoam and construction materials that are commonly used with geofoam are presented in this paper. The interfaces studied included geofoam to geofoam, in dry and wet conditions. Geofoam to cast in place concrete as well as geofoam to geomembrane interfaces were also tested. Interface strengths between geofoam and HDPE as well as PVC geomembranes were determined. The effect of geofoam surface degradation due to extended exposure to sunlight on interface strength and adhesion bonding with cast in place were evaluated using field samples and samples degraded by accelerated weathering in the laboratory. The results indicate material density; sample size, stress level and surface moisture do not have significant influence on geofoam to geofoam interface strengths. A strong adhesion bond developed between geofoam and cast in place concrete. Both the peak and residual strength for geofoam and cast in place concrete surfaces were much greater than for geofoam to geofoam interfaces. Degradation due to exposure to sunlight and accelerated weathering in the laboratory reduced the strength of adhesion bonding between geofoam and cast in place concrete. The interface strength between geofoam and geomembranes was found to be much lower than any of the geofoam interfaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845477314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845477314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:33845477314

VL - 112

SP - 292

EP - 303

BT - Geotechnical Special Publication

ER -