TY - JOUR
T1 - An integrated formulation for selecting the t best of k normal populations
AU - Chen, Pinyuen
AU - Sobel, Milton
PY - 1987
Y1 - 1987
N2 - We refer to the two classical approaches to ranking and selection as the indifference zone approach and the subset-selection approach. This paper integrates those two approaches by separating the parameter space into two disjoint parts, the preference zone < PZ} and the indifference zone (IZ). In the PZ we insist on selecting the t best for a correct selection (CS) but in the IZ we define any se1ected subset to be correct (GS0) if it contains the t best populations. We then use different methods to find two constants and a common sample size n that simultaneously give lower bounds P-, for (CSj|PZ) and Pn for P(CS0|IZ). Here the values of, PQ and 6 (which defines the PZ) are all specified and can be arbitrarily close to 1, 1 and 0, respectively. Explicit results are given for the P(CS), E(S), P(S = k) and P(S = t), especially for the slippage configuration (SPC) and the equal parameter configuration (EPC). It is shown that the former is least favorable in the PZ and, for t = 1, that the latter is the worst case in the IZ. An illustrative example is included, but extensive tables have not vet been developed.
AB - We refer to the two classical approaches to ranking and selection as the indifference zone approach and the subset-selection approach. This paper integrates those two approaches by separating the parameter space into two disjoint parts, the preference zone < PZ} and the indifference zone (IZ). In the PZ we insist on selecting the t best for a correct selection (CS) but in the IZ we define any se1ected subset to be correct (GS0) if it contains the t best populations. We then use different methods to find two constants and a common sample size n that simultaneously give lower bounds P-, for (CSj|PZ) and Pn for P(CS0|IZ). Here the values of, PQ and 6 (which defines the PZ) are all specified and can be arbitrarily close to 1, 1 and 0, respectively. Explicit results are given for the P(CS), E(S), P(S = k) and P(S = t), especially for the slippage configuration (SPC) and the equal parameter configuration (EPC). It is shown that the former is least favorable in the PZ and, for t = 1, that the latter is the worst case in the IZ. An illustrative example is included, but extensive tables have not vet been developed.
KW - in difference zone approach
KW - subset selection approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963476560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963476560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03610928708829355
DO - 10.1080/03610928708829355
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84963476560
SN - 0361-0926
VL - 16
SP - 121
EP - 146
JO - Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
JF - Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
IS - 1
ER -