TY - JOUR
T1 - An inflammatory fag and a queer form
T2 - Larry Kramer, polemics, and rhetorical agency
AU - Rand, Erin J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Erin J. Rand is Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Vanderbilt University. This essay is derived from a chapter of the author’s dissertation, directed by Barbara A. Biesecker and defended at the University of Iowa in 2006. The author wishes to thank Barbara A. Biesecker, Charles E. Morris III, David Hingstman, Leslie Hahner, Stephen Hartnett, and G. Mitchell Reyes, as well as Editors David Henry and John Louis Lucaites, and four anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions throughout the development of this essay. The author also appreciates the financial support of the Department of Communication Studies and the student government of the University of Iowa. Correspondence to: Department of Communication Studies, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B #351505, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235-1505. Email: [email protected].
PY - 2008/8
Y1 - 2008/8
N2 - Rhetorical agency is the capacity for words and actions to be intelligible and forceful, and to create effects through their formal and stylistic conventions. The polemical discourses of Larry Kramer, a controversial AIDS activist, demonstrate a concurrence of features that define the polemic as a rhetorical form and therefore enable agency: alienating expressions of emotion; non-contingent assertions of truth; presumptions of shared morality; and the constitution of enemies, audiences, and publics. The unexpected uptake of Kramer's texts by academics invites consideration of the polemic as a queer form that resists the assumption of a necessary and predictable relationship between an intending agent and an action's effects. Thus, the polemic highlights the riskiness, unpredictability, and inevitable contingency of agency, and positions queerness itself as the condition of possibility for any rhetorical act.
AB - Rhetorical agency is the capacity for words and actions to be intelligible and forceful, and to create effects through their formal and stylistic conventions. The polemical discourses of Larry Kramer, a controversial AIDS activist, demonstrate a concurrence of features that define the polemic as a rhetorical form and therefore enable agency: alienating expressions of emotion; non-contingent assertions of truth; presumptions of shared morality; and the constitution of enemies, audiences, and publics. The unexpected uptake of Kramer's texts by academics invites consideration of the polemic as a queer form that resists the assumption of a necessary and predictable relationship between an intending agent and an action's effects. Thus, the polemic highlights the riskiness, unpredictability, and inevitable contingency of agency, and positions queerness itself as the condition of possibility for any rhetorical act.
KW - Form
KW - Larry Kramer
KW - Polemics
KW - Queer
KW - Rhetorical Agency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49549112253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49549112253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00335630802210377
DO - 10.1080/00335630802210377
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:49549112253
SN - 0033-5630
VL - 94
SP - 297
EP - 319
JO - Quarterly Journal of Speech
JF - Quarterly Journal of Speech
IS - 3
ER -