An evaluation of a Vision Zero traffic-calming intervention, an urban transportation safety policy

Leonard M. Lopoo, Emily Cardon, Sarah Souders, Maximilian Kroner Dale, Uyen Ngo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Today over 40 major metropolitan areas in the United States have formally adopted a new “Vision Zero” road design framework to prioritize roadway safety and eliminate traffic-related fatalities. This policy framework diffused across much of Europe and, more recently, the United States. In 2019, the City of San Francisco, California, implemented a series of traffic-calming interventions designed to lower speeds on left-hand turns and thereby reduce severe pedestrian and bicyclist injuries. This study uses a quasi-experimental design to evaluate this innovation. Results show that these safety measures reduced speeds between 1.4 and 1.9 miles per hour and that these reductions were sustained for at least 1 year. A conservative cost-benefit analysis suggests that these interventions have a large, positive return on investment, and that they are justified for any intersection with 2.5 or more pedestrian- or cyclist-involved crashes over a 5-year window.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Transportation safety
  • evaluation
  • urban traffic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of a Vision Zero traffic-calming intervention, an urban transportation safety policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this