TY - GEN
T1 - An evaluation mechanism for defining gaps and overlaps of product information exchange standards
AU - Sarigecili, Mehmet I.
AU - Baysal, Mehmet Murat
AU - Roy, Utpal
AU - Rachuri, Sudarsan
AU - Sriram, Ram D.
AU - Mani, Mahesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2007 by ASME.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The need to exchange information between organizations or departments of the same corporation is hampered by interoperability problems that mostly originate from the necessity to comply with diverse standards while using dissimilar applications. Each organization generally uses different standards (both local and international) for products which they produce or use. The differences and similarities of these standards, or gaps and overlaps between these standards create problems when exchanging product information through the product life cycle. Defining gaps and overlaps for these standards will help us better understand the interoperability issues. This will aid in the development of strategies for reducing interoperability problems, thus improving efficient information exchange. In this study, we present different approaches for comparing standards and for identifying gaps and overlaps in standards. A Matrix-based evaluation mechanism developed for this purpose is also described.
AB - The need to exchange information between organizations or departments of the same corporation is hampered by interoperability problems that mostly originate from the necessity to comply with diverse standards while using dissimilar applications. Each organization generally uses different standards (both local and international) for products which they produce or use. The differences and similarities of these standards, or gaps and overlaps between these standards create problems when exchanging product information through the product life cycle. Defining gaps and overlaps for these standards will help us better understand the interoperability issues. This will aid in the development of strategies for reducing interoperability problems, thus improving efficient information exchange. In this study, we present different approaches for comparing standards and for identifying gaps and overlaps in standards. A Matrix-based evaluation mechanism developed for this purpose is also described.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928691018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928691018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/IMECE200742555
DO - 10.1115/IMECE200742555
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84928691018
T3 - ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
SP - 179
EP - 185
BT - Design and Manufacturing
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2007
Y2 - 11 November 2007 through 15 November 2007
ER -