An evaluation mechanism for defining gaps and overlaps of product information exchange standards

Mehmet I. Sarigecili, Mehmet Murat Baysal, Utpal Roy, Sudarsan Rachuri, Ram D. Sriram, Mahesh Mani

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The need to exchange information between organizations or departments of the same corporation is hampered by interoperability problems that mostly originate from the necessity to comply with diverse standards while using dissimilar applications. Each organization generally uses different standards (both local and international) for products which they produce or use. The differences and similarities of these standards, or gaps and overlaps between these standards create problems when exchanging product information through the product life cycle. Defining gaps and overlaps for these standards will help us better understand the interoperability issues. This will aid in the development of strategies for reducing interoperability problems, thus improving efficient information exchange. In this study, we present different approaches for comparing standards and for identifying gaps and overlaps in standards. A Matrix-based evaluation mechanism developed for this purpose is also described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDesign and Manufacturing
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Pages179-185
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)0791842975
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007
EventASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2007 - Seattle, United States
Duration: Nov 11 2007Nov 15 2007

Publication series

NameASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
Volume3

Other

OtherASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2007
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle
Period11/11/0711/15/07

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation mechanism for defining gaps and overlaps of product information exchange standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this