Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the evolving dynamic between citizens, journalists, and politicians-what we call agenda control-using the CNN/YouTube presidential primary debates as a case. A systematic content analysis of questions asked and candidates' answers as compared with standard journalist-as-questioner debates hosted by MSNBC reveals that the dynamic between politicians, journalists, and citizens suggests that journalists do a better job of getting candidates to answer questions than do citizens in the YouTube video format, not by virtue of being journalists, but by virtue of asking the right form of question. Results also indicate that the CNN/YouTube debate questions from citizens failed to reflect the broad set of issues of interest to those who submitted questions, and instead included a disproportionate number of culture-war issues and campaign strategy questions. Findings suggest that journalists maintain the upper hand in agenda control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-546
Number of pages18
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

CNN
journalist
citizen
politician
candidacy
content analysis
video
campaign

Keywords

  • Debates
  • New Media
  • Political Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates. / Stromer-Galley, Jennifer; Bryant, Lauren.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 529-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stromer-Galley, Jennifer ; Bryant, Lauren. / Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates. In: Communication Quarterly. 2011 ; Vol. 59, No. 5. pp. 529-546.
@article{135949703c9b436ebde0b8ba4b0822d7,
title = "Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates",
abstract = "This article examines the evolving dynamic between citizens, journalists, and politicians-what we call agenda control-using the CNN/YouTube presidential primary debates as a case. A systematic content analysis of questions asked and candidates' answers as compared with standard journalist-as-questioner debates hosted by MSNBC reveals that the dynamic between politicians, journalists, and citizens suggests that journalists do a better job of getting candidates to answer questions than do citizens in the YouTube video format, not by virtue of being journalists, but by virtue of asking the right form of question. Results also indicate that the CNN/YouTube debate questions from citizens failed to reflect the broad set of issues of interest to those who submitted questions, and instead included a disproportionate number of culture-war issues and campaign strategy questions. Findings suggest that journalists maintain the upper hand in agenda control.",
keywords = "Debates, New Media, Political Communication",
author = "Jennifer Stromer-Galley and Lauren Bryant",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/01463373.2011.614212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "529--546",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates

AU - Stromer-Galley, Jennifer

AU - Bryant, Lauren

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - This article examines the evolving dynamic between citizens, journalists, and politicians-what we call agenda control-using the CNN/YouTube presidential primary debates as a case. A systematic content analysis of questions asked and candidates' answers as compared with standard journalist-as-questioner debates hosted by MSNBC reveals that the dynamic between politicians, journalists, and citizens suggests that journalists do a better job of getting candidates to answer questions than do citizens in the YouTube video format, not by virtue of being journalists, but by virtue of asking the right form of question. Results also indicate that the CNN/YouTube debate questions from citizens failed to reflect the broad set of issues of interest to those who submitted questions, and instead included a disproportionate number of culture-war issues and campaign strategy questions. Findings suggest that journalists maintain the upper hand in agenda control.

AB - This article examines the evolving dynamic between citizens, journalists, and politicians-what we call agenda control-using the CNN/YouTube presidential primary debates as a case. A systematic content analysis of questions asked and candidates' answers as compared with standard journalist-as-questioner debates hosted by MSNBC reveals that the dynamic between politicians, journalists, and citizens suggests that journalists do a better job of getting candidates to answer questions than do citizens in the YouTube video format, not by virtue of being journalists, but by virtue of asking the right form of question. Results also indicate that the CNN/YouTube debate questions from citizens failed to reflect the broad set of issues of interest to those who submitted questions, and instead included a disproportionate number of culture-war issues and campaign strategy questions. Findings suggest that journalists maintain the upper hand in agenda control.

KW - Debates

KW - New Media

KW - Political Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858040207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858040207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463373.2011.614212

DO - 10.1080/01463373.2011.614212

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 529

EP - 546

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 5

ER -