Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort

Allison L. Rosenthal, Soren Lowell, Raymond H. Colton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the aerodynamic and acoustic features of speech produced at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. Study Design Prospective, quasi-experimental research design. Method Eighteen healthy participants with normal voice were included in this study. After task training, participants produced repeated syllable combinations at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. A pneumotachometer and vented (Rothenberg) mask were used to record aerodynamic data, with simultaneous recording of the acoustic signal for subsequent analysis. Aerodynamic measures of subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), and laryngeal resistance were analyzed, along with acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and its standard deviation (SD). Results Participants produced significantly greater subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR during maximal effort speech as compared with comfortable vocal effort. When producing speech at minimal vocal effort, participants lowered subglottal pressure, MFDR, and laryngeal resistance. Acoustic changes associated with changes in vocal effort included significantly higher CPP during maximal effort speech and significantly lower CPP SD during minimal effort speech, when each was compared with comfortable effort. Conclusions For healthy speakers without voice disorders, subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR may be important factors that contribute to an increased sense of vocal effort. Changes in the cepstral signal also occur under conditions of increased or decreased vocal effort relative to comfortable effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-153
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Voice
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Pressure
Research Design
Speech Acoustics
Voice Disorders
Masks
Healthy Volunteers
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Acoustic
  • Aerodynamic
  • Airflow
  • Cepstral
  • Laryngeal resistance
  • Maximum flow declination rate
  • Pressure
  • Vocal effort
  • Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort. / Rosenthal, Allison L.; Lowell, Soren; Colton, Raymond H.

In: Journal of Voice, Vol. 28, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 144-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenthal, Allison L. ; Lowell, Soren ; Colton, Raymond H. / Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort. In: Journal of Voice. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 144-153.
@article{1f1b26046e764564bd278af8977303f3,
title = "Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort",
abstract = "Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the aerodynamic and acoustic features of speech produced at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. Study Design Prospective, quasi-experimental research design. Method Eighteen healthy participants with normal voice were included in this study. After task training, participants produced repeated syllable combinations at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. A pneumotachometer and vented (Rothenberg) mask were used to record aerodynamic data, with simultaneous recording of the acoustic signal for subsequent analysis. Aerodynamic measures of subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), and laryngeal resistance were analyzed, along with acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and its standard deviation (SD). Results Participants produced significantly greater subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR during maximal effort speech as compared with comfortable vocal effort. When producing speech at minimal vocal effort, participants lowered subglottal pressure, MFDR, and laryngeal resistance. Acoustic changes associated with changes in vocal effort included significantly higher CPP during maximal effort speech and significantly lower CPP SD during minimal effort speech, when each was compared with comfortable effort. Conclusions For healthy speakers without voice disorders, subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR may be important factors that contribute to an increased sense of vocal effort. Changes in the cepstral signal also occur under conditions of increased or decreased vocal effort relative to comfortable effort.",
keywords = "Acoustic, Aerodynamic, Airflow, Cepstral, Laryngeal resistance, Maximum flow declination rate, Pressure, Vocal effort, Voice",
author = "Rosenthal, {Allison L.} and Soren Lowell and Colton, {Raymond H.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "144--153",
journal = "Journal of Voice",
issn = "0892-1997",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort

AU - Rosenthal, Allison L.

AU - Lowell, Soren

AU - Colton, Raymond H.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the aerodynamic and acoustic features of speech produced at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. Study Design Prospective, quasi-experimental research design. Method Eighteen healthy participants with normal voice were included in this study. After task training, participants produced repeated syllable combinations at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. A pneumotachometer and vented (Rothenberg) mask were used to record aerodynamic data, with simultaneous recording of the acoustic signal for subsequent analysis. Aerodynamic measures of subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), and laryngeal resistance were analyzed, along with acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and its standard deviation (SD). Results Participants produced significantly greater subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR during maximal effort speech as compared with comfortable vocal effort. When producing speech at minimal vocal effort, participants lowered subglottal pressure, MFDR, and laryngeal resistance. Acoustic changes associated with changes in vocal effort included significantly higher CPP during maximal effort speech and significantly lower CPP SD during minimal effort speech, when each was compared with comfortable effort. Conclusions For healthy speakers without voice disorders, subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR may be important factors that contribute to an increased sense of vocal effort. Changes in the cepstral signal also occur under conditions of increased or decreased vocal effort relative to comfortable effort.

AB - Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the aerodynamic and acoustic features of speech produced at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. Study Design Prospective, quasi-experimental research design. Method Eighteen healthy participants with normal voice were included in this study. After task training, participants produced repeated syllable combinations at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. A pneumotachometer and vented (Rothenberg) mask were used to record aerodynamic data, with simultaneous recording of the acoustic signal for subsequent analysis. Aerodynamic measures of subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), and laryngeal resistance were analyzed, along with acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and its standard deviation (SD). Results Participants produced significantly greater subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR during maximal effort speech as compared with comfortable vocal effort. When producing speech at minimal vocal effort, participants lowered subglottal pressure, MFDR, and laryngeal resistance. Acoustic changes associated with changes in vocal effort included significantly higher CPP during maximal effort speech and significantly lower CPP SD during minimal effort speech, when each was compared with comfortable effort. Conclusions For healthy speakers without voice disorders, subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR may be important factors that contribute to an increased sense of vocal effort. Changes in the cepstral signal also occur under conditions of increased or decreased vocal effort relative to comfortable effort.

KW - Acoustic

KW - Aerodynamic

KW - Airflow

KW - Cepstral

KW - Laryngeal resistance

KW - Maximum flow declination rate

KW - Pressure

KW - Vocal effort

KW - Voice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896699861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896699861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 24412040

AN - SCOPUS:84896699861

VL - 28

SP - 144

EP - 153

JO - Journal of Voice

JF - Journal of Voice

SN - 0892-1997

IS - 2

ER -