Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits

The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews and synthesizes diverse streams of literature to assess the potential of deliberative democracy for American public administration. It asserts that the field should refocus its attention on the role of citizens in the work of government to help address the pervasive citizenship and democratic deficits in the United States. American public administration has an obligation to address these deficits because (a) it is required to do so by democratic ethos, (b) it has contributed to the deficits with its widespread embrace of bureaucratic ethos, and (c) it must find ways to effectively engage citizens within modern network and collaborative governance structures. This article identifies deliberative democracy as one potential method to help fulfill these obligations and explains how deliberative processes may help address the deficit problems. The article concludes by identifying a preliminary research agenda for exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-399
Number of pages24
JournalThe American Review of Public Administration
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
public administration
deficit
citizenship
obligation
citizen
governance
Deliberative democracy
Citizenship
Public Administration
Obligation
Ethos

Keywords

  • bureaucratic ethos
  • citizenship deficits
  • deliberative democracy
  • democratic deficits
  • democratic ethos

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{1628fe2f0253422ea83de3248557a346,
title = "Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration",
abstract = "This article reviews and synthesizes diverse streams of literature to assess the potential of deliberative democracy for American public administration. It asserts that the field should refocus its attention on the role of citizens in the work of government to help address the pervasive citizenship and democratic deficits in the United States. American public administration has an obligation to address these deficits because (a) it is required to do so by democratic ethos, (b) it has contributed to the deficits with its widespread embrace of bureaucratic ethos, and (c) it must find ways to effectively engage citizens within modern network and collaborative governance structures. This article identifies deliberative democracy as one potential method to help fulfill these obligations and explains how deliberative processes may help address the deficit problems. The article concludes by identifying a preliminary research agenda for exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration.",
keywords = "bureaucratic ethos, citizenship deficits, deliberative democracy, democratic deficits, democratic ethos",
author = "Tina Nabatchi",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074009356467",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "376--399",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits

T2 - The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - This article reviews and synthesizes diverse streams of literature to assess the potential of deliberative democracy for American public administration. It asserts that the field should refocus its attention on the role of citizens in the work of government to help address the pervasive citizenship and democratic deficits in the United States. American public administration has an obligation to address these deficits because (a) it is required to do so by democratic ethos, (b) it has contributed to the deficits with its widespread embrace of bureaucratic ethos, and (c) it must find ways to effectively engage citizens within modern network and collaborative governance structures. This article identifies deliberative democracy as one potential method to help fulfill these obligations and explains how deliberative processes may help address the deficit problems. The article concludes by identifying a preliminary research agenda for exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration.

AB - This article reviews and synthesizes diverse streams of literature to assess the potential of deliberative democracy for American public administration. It asserts that the field should refocus its attention on the role of citizens in the work of government to help address the pervasive citizenship and democratic deficits in the United States. American public administration has an obligation to address these deficits because (a) it is required to do so by democratic ethos, (b) it has contributed to the deficits with its widespread embrace of bureaucratic ethos, and (c) it must find ways to effectively engage citizens within modern network and collaborative governance structures. This article identifies deliberative democracy as one potential method to help fulfill these obligations and explains how deliberative processes may help address the deficit problems. The article concludes by identifying a preliminary research agenda for exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration.

KW - bureaucratic ethos

KW - citizenship deficits

KW - deliberative democracy

KW - democratic deficits

KW - democratic ethos

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650870921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650870921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074009356467

DO - 10.1177/0275074009356467

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 376

EP - 399

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 4

ER -