Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline

Richard Buttny, Donald G. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The North American network, ABC-Television, broadcast the news-panel program, Nightline, from Jerusalem during the beginning days of the Second Intifada. One of the main themes of this discussion was the violence, pain and trauma - the civilians killed or wounded, the military's actions, and how it all started. Even the horrible facts of violence must be told or narrated and discussed for their morality, causes, consequences, responsibility and political ramifications. In this sense, violence is discursive. How violence gets told, how versions get constructed or contested, is our focus. Participants used the communicative practices of invoking membership categories and activity terms and formulating events in support of their evaluative viewpoint. These membership categories were often presented by the use of conflicting positionings in referencing persons or events. The 'conflict' between descriptive terms draws attention to something problematic. Talk of violence also makes relevant reports of affect/feeling. In reporting violence, affect/feeling is reconstructed by participants as both a consequence and a cause of action, to intensify a condition, to raise moral issues, as an obstacle to be overcome, as a shorthand condition to ascribe of another to invite a telling of the events, or to ascribe as an opponent's political strategy. Such discursive uses of affect/feeling help to make concrete the human costs of violence. In addition, the panelists' answers were designed not only for the interviewer or fellow panelists, but to multiple audiences, including millions of TV viewers in the USA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-161
Number of pages23
JournalDiscourse and Society
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Israeli
Arab
violence
event
Television networks
television broadcast
Intifada
political strategy
cause
Violence
morality
trauma
pain
news
Military
Concretes
responsibility
human being
costs
interview

Keywords

  • Accounts
  • Affect
  • Broadcast news interviews
  • Discourse of violence
  • Middle East conflict
  • Positioning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline. / Buttny, Richard; Ellis, Donald G.

In: Discourse and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 139-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buttny, Richard ; Ellis, Donald G. / Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline. In: Discourse and Society. 2007 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 139-161.
@article{ef08bd44ca8149f9a80074df28769ffd,
title = "Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline",
abstract = "The North American network, ABC-Television, broadcast the news-panel program, Nightline, from Jerusalem during the beginning days of the Second Intifada. One of the main themes of this discussion was the violence, pain and trauma - the civilians killed or wounded, the military's actions, and how it all started. Even the horrible facts of violence must be told or narrated and discussed for their morality, causes, consequences, responsibility and political ramifications. In this sense, violence is discursive. How violence gets told, how versions get constructed or contested, is our focus. Participants used the communicative practices of invoking membership categories and activity terms and formulating events in support of their evaluative viewpoint. These membership categories were often presented by the use of conflicting positionings in referencing persons or events. The 'conflict' between descriptive terms draws attention to something problematic. Talk of violence also makes relevant reports of affect/feeling. In reporting violence, affect/feeling is reconstructed by participants as both a consequence and a cause of action, to intensify a condition, to raise moral issues, as an obstacle to be overcome, as a shorthand condition to ascribe of another to invite a telling of the events, or to ascribe as an opponent's political strategy. Such discursive uses of affect/feeling help to make concrete the human costs of violence. In addition, the panelists' answers were designed not only for the interviewer or fellow panelists, but to multiple audiences, including millions of TV viewers in the USA.",
keywords = "Accounts, Affect, Broadcast news interviews, Discourse of violence, Middle East conflict, Positioning",
author = "Richard Buttny and Ellis, {Donald G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0957926507073371",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "139--161",
journal = "Discourse and Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline

AU - Buttny, Richard

AU - Ellis, Donald G.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - The North American network, ABC-Television, broadcast the news-panel program, Nightline, from Jerusalem during the beginning days of the Second Intifada. One of the main themes of this discussion was the violence, pain and trauma - the civilians killed or wounded, the military's actions, and how it all started. Even the horrible facts of violence must be told or narrated and discussed for their morality, causes, consequences, responsibility and political ramifications. In this sense, violence is discursive. How violence gets told, how versions get constructed or contested, is our focus. Participants used the communicative practices of invoking membership categories and activity terms and formulating events in support of their evaluative viewpoint. These membership categories were often presented by the use of conflicting positionings in referencing persons or events. The 'conflict' between descriptive terms draws attention to something problematic. Talk of violence also makes relevant reports of affect/feeling. In reporting violence, affect/feeling is reconstructed by participants as both a consequence and a cause of action, to intensify a condition, to raise moral issues, as an obstacle to be overcome, as a shorthand condition to ascribe of another to invite a telling of the events, or to ascribe as an opponent's political strategy. Such discursive uses of affect/feeling help to make concrete the human costs of violence. In addition, the panelists' answers were designed not only for the interviewer or fellow panelists, but to multiple audiences, including millions of TV viewers in the USA.

AB - The North American network, ABC-Television, broadcast the news-panel program, Nightline, from Jerusalem during the beginning days of the Second Intifada. One of the main themes of this discussion was the violence, pain and trauma - the civilians killed or wounded, the military's actions, and how it all started. Even the horrible facts of violence must be told or narrated and discussed for their morality, causes, consequences, responsibility and political ramifications. In this sense, violence is discursive. How violence gets told, how versions get constructed or contested, is our focus. Participants used the communicative practices of invoking membership categories and activity terms and formulating events in support of their evaluative viewpoint. These membership categories were often presented by the use of conflicting positionings in referencing persons or events. The 'conflict' between descriptive terms draws attention to something problematic. Talk of violence also makes relevant reports of affect/feeling. In reporting violence, affect/feeling is reconstructed by participants as both a consequence and a cause of action, to intensify a condition, to raise moral issues, as an obstacle to be overcome, as a shorthand condition to ascribe of another to invite a telling of the events, or to ascribe as an opponent's political strategy. Such discursive uses of affect/feeling help to make concrete the human costs of violence. In addition, the panelists' answers were designed not only for the interviewer or fellow panelists, but to multiple audiences, including millions of TV viewers in the USA.

KW - Accounts

KW - Affect

KW - Broadcast news interviews

KW - Discourse of violence

KW - Middle East conflict

KW - Positioning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847409230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847409230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0957926507073371

DO - 10.1177/0957926507073371

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847409230

VL - 18

SP - 139

EP - 161

JO - Discourse and Society

JF - Discourse and Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 2

ER -