Abstract
What does it mean for an agent faced with choice under uncertainty to “know” something? While a variety of mathematical methods are available to construct formal models to answer this question, the combination of different approaches may lead to unsettling paradoxes. I propose a unified theory that eliminates such inconsistencies by relying on a sharp conceptual distinction between information the decision-maker observes and how much of that information she can cognitively process. The resulting model allows for natural decision-theoretic characterizations of comparing different amounts of information.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 63-83 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Theory and Decision |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2021 |
Keywords
- Information
- Knowledge
- Measure theory
- Partitions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Decision Sciences
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Applied Psychology
- Computer Science Applications
- General Social Sciences