A test for selection in matched administrative earnings data

Jesse Bricker, Gary Engelhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The matching of administrative records to labor-market surveys is both commonly done and represents an important innovation in the measurement of earnings. However, a potential problem is that this process might introduce sample-selection bias. Individuals typically must give informed consent to have their earnings matched, and consenters may display systematically different labor-market behavior than nonconsenters. In this paper, we use the differential timing of the consent process to test whether individuals in the Health and Retirement Study who consented represent a non-random, thus biased sample. In particular, we find that for both men and women there is a general pattern of negative selection across three measures of pre-entry labor-market behavior: labor-force participation, self-employment, and earnings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-255
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Economic and Social Measurement
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2015

Fingerprint

labor market
self-employment
labor force participation
retirement
innovation
trend
health

Keywords

  • Earnings
  • selection bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

A test for selection in matched administrative earnings data. / Bricker, Jesse; Engelhardt, Gary.

In: Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 39, No. 4, 30.06.2015, p. 247-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e6ed39d8651454d95e2b86b5dfc1ea5,
title = "A test for selection in matched administrative earnings data",
abstract = "The matching of administrative records to labor-market surveys is both commonly done and represents an important innovation in the measurement of earnings. However, a potential problem is that this process might introduce sample-selection bias. Individuals typically must give informed consent to have their earnings matched, and consenters may display systematically different labor-market behavior than nonconsenters. In this paper, we use the differential timing of the consent process to test whether individuals in the Health and Retirement Study who consented represent a non-random, thus biased sample. In particular, we find that for both men and women there is a general pattern of negative selection across three measures of pre-entry labor-market behavior: labor-force participation, self-employment, and earnings.",
keywords = "Earnings, selection bias",
author = "Jesse Bricker and Gary Engelhardt",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3233/JEM-150392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "247--255",
journal = "Journal of Economic and Social Measurement",
issn = "0747-9662",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A test for selection in matched administrative earnings data

AU - Bricker, Jesse

AU - Engelhardt, Gary

PY - 2015/6/30

Y1 - 2015/6/30

N2 - The matching of administrative records to labor-market surveys is both commonly done and represents an important innovation in the measurement of earnings. However, a potential problem is that this process might introduce sample-selection bias. Individuals typically must give informed consent to have their earnings matched, and consenters may display systematically different labor-market behavior than nonconsenters. In this paper, we use the differential timing of the consent process to test whether individuals in the Health and Retirement Study who consented represent a non-random, thus biased sample. In particular, we find that for both men and women there is a general pattern of negative selection across three measures of pre-entry labor-market behavior: labor-force participation, self-employment, and earnings.

AB - The matching of administrative records to labor-market surveys is both commonly done and represents an important innovation in the measurement of earnings. However, a potential problem is that this process might introduce sample-selection bias. Individuals typically must give informed consent to have their earnings matched, and consenters may display systematically different labor-market behavior than nonconsenters. In this paper, we use the differential timing of the consent process to test whether individuals in the Health and Retirement Study who consented represent a non-random, thus biased sample. In particular, we find that for both men and women there is a general pattern of negative selection across three measures of pre-entry labor-market behavior: labor-force participation, self-employment, and earnings.

KW - Earnings

KW - selection bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936763858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936763858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JEM-150392

DO - 10.3233/JEM-150392

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 247

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Economic and Social Measurement

JF - Journal of Economic and Social Measurement

SN - 0747-9662

IS - 4

ER -