TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of human and natural changes in Maya Lowland wetlands over the Holocene
AU - Beach, Tim
AU - Luzzadder-Beach, Sheryl
AU - Dunning, Nicholas
AU - Jones, John
AU - Lohse, Jon
AU - Guderjan, Tom
AU - Bozarth, Steve
AU - Millspaugh, Sarah
AU - Bhattacharya, Tripti
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the following for support and funding: Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service, Cinco Hermanos Chair in Environment and International Affairs, and Graduate School; grants from The National Geographic Society (CRE-7506-03, CRE-7861-05; T. Beach and S. Luzzadder-Beach PIs), The Guggenheim Foundation, Dumbarton Oaks, and The National Science Foundation (Nos. BCS-0241757 and BCS-0650393, N. Dunning PI); George Mason University's Center for Global Studies and Provost's Office; and The University of Cincinnati. In Belize we worked within the Maya Research Program, Jon Lohse and Tom Guderjan, Directors, the Programme for Belize Archaeological Project, Fred Valdez Jr., Director, and with the gracious cooperation of the Department of Archaeology, Ministry of Tourism and the Environment, the Programme for Belize, and the communities of Blue Creek and San Felipe. We also thank Drs. W. I. Woods, T. Garrison, D. Howard, L. Kozikowski, J. Kunen, K. Pope, V. Scarborough, K. Sagebiel, S. Houston, R. Terry, K. Cox, Esq., anonymous reviewers, and many graduate and undergraduate students of our institutions.
PY - 2009/8
Y1 - 2009/8
N2 - In the Maya Lowlands of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala two main types of wetlands have played important roles in human history: bajos or intermittently wet environments of the upland, interior Yucatán and perennial wetlands of the coastal plains. Many of the most important Maya sites encircle the bajos, though our growing evidence for human-wetland interactions is still sparse. The deposits of these wetlands record two main eras of slope instability and wetland aggradation: the Pleistocene-Holocene transition as rainfall increased and forests eclipsed savannas and the Maya Preclassic to Classic as deforestation, land-use intensity, and drying increased. The ancient Maya adapted with terraces around these bajo margins but retracted in the Late Preclassic in some areas. The perennial wetlands of the coastal plains have different histories, and the first conceptual model of human-wetland interaction described intensive wetland agriculture in the Preclassic through Classic based on raised fields and canals. But a second model arose that interpreted the wetland stratigraphy and canals as more indicative of natural aggradation by accelerated erosion and gypsum precipitation that buried Archaic and Preclassic fields and there was little Classic era use. We present new data on a third and fourth model in this study. The third is a hybrid of the models one and two, including the Archaic to Preclassic aggradation of the second model, and the first model's Classic period fields and canals as piecemeal attempts by the Maya to adapt to these and other environmental changes. The fourth conceptual model describes a very Late/Terminal Classic, preplanned project on a floodplain. These wetland fields were short-lived, aggraded rapidly but with some reoccupation in the Postclassic. All of these new models display the burgeoning evidence for intricate Maya interactions with wetlands, and the diversity of evidence from the relatively few studies underscores the infancy of our understanding of Maya interaction with tropical wetlands.
AB - In the Maya Lowlands of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala two main types of wetlands have played important roles in human history: bajos or intermittently wet environments of the upland, interior Yucatán and perennial wetlands of the coastal plains. Many of the most important Maya sites encircle the bajos, though our growing evidence for human-wetland interactions is still sparse. The deposits of these wetlands record two main eras of slope instability and wetland aggradation: the Pleistocene-Holocene transition as rainfall increased and forests eclipsed savannas and the Maya Preclassic to Classic as deforestation, land-use intensity, and drying increased. The ancient Maya adapted with terraces around these bajo margins but retracted in the Late Preclassic in some areas. The perennial wetlands of the coastal plains have different histories, and the first conceptual model of human-wetland interaction described intensive wetland agriculture in the Preclassic through Classic based on raised fields and canals. But a second model arose that interpreted the wetland stratigraphy and canals as more indicative of natural aggradation by accelerated erosion and gypsum precipitation that buried Archaic and Preclassic fields and there was little Classic era use. We present new data on a third and fourth model in this study. The third is a hybrid of the models one and two, including the Archaic to Preclassic aggradation of the second model, and the first model's Classic period fields and canals as piecemeal attempts by the Maya to adapt to these and other environmental changes. The fourth conceptual model describes a very Late/Terminal Classic, preplanned project on a floodplain. These wetland fields were short-lived, aggraded rapidly but with some reoccupation in the Postclassic. All of these new models display the burgeoning evidence for intricate Maya interactions with wetlands, and the diversity of evidence from the relatively few studies underscores the infancy of our understanding of Maya interaction with tropical wetlands.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650901231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650901231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67650901231
SN - 0277-3791
VL - 28
SP - 1710
EP - 1724
JO - Quaternary Science Reviews
JF - Quaternary Science Reviews
IS - 17-18
ER -