A Retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall

Lynn Lohnas, Michael J. Kahana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Repeating an item in a list benefits recall performance, and this benefit increases when the repetitions are spaced apart (Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1970). Retrieved context theory incorporates 2 mechanisms that account for these effects: contextual variability and study-phase retrieval. Specifically, if an item presented at position i is repeated at position j, this leads to retrieval of its context from its initial presentation at i (study-phase retrieval), and this retrieved context will be used to update the current state of context (contextual variability). Here we consider predictions of a computational model that embodies retrieved context theory, the context maintenance and retrieval model (CMR; Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009). CMR makes the novel prediction that subjects are more likely to successively recall items that follow a shared repeated item (e.g., i + 1, j + 1) because both items are associated with the context of the repeated item presented at i and j. CMR also predicts that the probability of recalling at least 1 of 2 studied items should increase with the items' spacing (Lohnas, Polyn, & Kahana, 2011). We tested these predictions in a new experiment, and CMR's predictions were upheld. These findings suggest that retrieved context theory offers an integrated explanation for repetition and spacing effects in free recall tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)755-764
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Maintenance
Spacing
Free Recall
experiment
performance
Prediction

Keywords

  • Context
  • Free recall
  • Lag effect
  • Repetition effect
  • Spacing effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

A Retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall. / Lohnas, Lynn; Kahana, Michael J.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 755-764.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{872348dc01ea4833854fccb040ac37f1,
title = "A Retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall",
abstract = "Repeating an item in a list benefits recall performance, and this benefit increases when the repetitions are spaced apart (Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1970). Retrieved context theory incorporates 2 mechanisms that account for these effects: contextual variability and study-phase retrieval. Specifically, if an item presented at position i is repeated at position j, this leads to retrieval of its context from its initial presentation at i (study-phase retrieval), and this retrieved context will be used to update the current state of context (contextual variability). Here we consider predictions of a computational model that embodies retrieved context theory, the context maintenance and retrieval model (CMR; Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009). CMR makes the novel prediction that subjects are more likely to successively recall items that follow a shared repeated item (e.g., i + 1, j + 1) because both items are associated with the context of the repeated item presented at i and j. CMR also predicts that the probability of recalling at least 1 of 2 studied items should increase with the items' spacing (Lohnas, Polyn, & Kahana, 2011). We tested these predictions in a new experiment, and CMR's predictions were upheld. These findings suggest that retrieved context theory offers an integrated explanation for repetition and spacing effects in free recall tasks.",
keywords = "Context, Free recall, Lag effect, Repetition effect, Spacing effect",
author = "Lynn Lohnas and Kahana, {Michael J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0035585",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "755--764",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall

AU - Lohnas, Lynn

AU - Kahana, Michael J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Repeating an item in a list benefits recall performance, and this benefit increases when the repetitions are spaced apart (Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1970). Retrieved context theory incorporates 2 mechanisms that account for these effects: contextual variability and study-phase retrieval. Specifically, if an item presented at position i is repeated at position j, this leads to retrieval of its context from its initial presentation at i (study-phase retrieval), and this retrieved context will be used to update the current state of context (contextual variability). Here we consider predictions of a computational model that embodies retrieved context theory, the context maintenance and retrieval model (CMR; Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009). CMR makes the novel prediction that subjects are more likely to successively recall items that follow a shared repeated item (e.g., i + 1, j + 1) because both items are associated with the context of the repeated item presented at i and j. CMR also predicts that the probability of recalling at least 1 of 2 studied items should increase with the items' spacing (Lohnas, Polyn, & Kahana, 2011). We tested these predictions in a new experiment, and CMR's predictions were upheld. These findings suggest that retrieved context theory offers an integrated explanation for repetition and spacing effects in free recall tasks.

AB - Repeating an item in a list benefits recall performance, and this benefit increases when the repetitions are spaced apart (Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1970). Retrieved context theory incorporates 2 mechanisms that account for these effects: contextual variability and study-phase retrieval. Specifically, if an item presented at position i is repeated at position j, this leads to retrieval of its context from its initial presentation at i (study-phase retrieval), and this retrieved context will be used to update the current state of context (contextual variability). Here we consider predictions of a computational model that embodies retrieved context theory, the context maintenance and retrieval model (CMR; Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009). CMR makes the novel prediction that subjects are more likely to successively recall items that follow a shared repeated item (e.g., i + 1, j + 1) because both items are associated with the context of the repeated item presented at i and j. CMR also predicts that the probability of recalling at least 1 of 2 studied items should increase with the items' spacing (Lohnas, Polyn, & Kahana, 2011). We tested these predictions in a new experiment, and CMR's predictions were upheld. These findings suggest that retrieved context theory offers an integrated explanation for repetition and spacing effects in free recall tasks.

KW - Context

KW - Free recall

KW - Lag effect

KW - Repetition effect

KW - Spacing effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925860994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925860994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0035585

DO - 10.1037/a0035585

M3 - Article

C2 - 24564545

AN - SCOPUS:84925860994

VL - 40

SP - 755

EP - 764

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -