A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability

Do stakeholders agree?

Katherine E McDonald, Nicole E. Conroy, Robert S. Olick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability inform research policy and practice, impact interest in and support for research participation, and promote or discourage the generation of new knowledge to promote health among adults with intellectual disability. Yet we know little about these beliefs among the public and the scientific community. Objective/Hypothesis: We quantitatively studied attitudes among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) members. We predicted that adults with intellectual disability, and researchers would espouse views most consistent with disability rights, whereas IRB members, and to a lesser degree family, friends, and service providers, would espouse more protective views. Methods: We surveyed five hundred and twelve members of the five participant stakeholder groups on their attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. Results: We found broad support for research about people with intellectual disability, though slightly more tempered support for their direct participation therein. In general, IRB members and to some extent adults with intellectual disability endorsed direct participation less than others. We also found that adults with intellectual disability strongly believed in their consent capacity. Conclusions: Resources should be directed toward health-related research with adults with intellectual disability, and interventions should be pursued to address ethical challenges and promote beliefs consistent with human rights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDisability and Health Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Intellectual Disability
Research
Research Ethics Committees
Research Personnel
Health
Disabled Persons

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Intellectual disability
  • Research ethics
  • Research participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{6d27e617180c4d70ad882c61d16e865f,
title = "A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?",
abstract = "Background: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability inform research policy and practice, impact interest in and support for research participation, and promote or discourage the generation of new knowledge to promote health among adults with intellectual disability. Yet we know little about these beliefs among the public and the scientific community. Objective/Hypothesis: We quantitatively studied attitudes among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) members. We predicted that adults with intellectual disability, and researchers would espouse views most consistent with disability rights, whereas IRB members, and to a lesser degree family, friends, and service providers, would espouse more protective views. Methods: We surveyed five hundred and twelve members of the five participant stakeholder groups on their attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. Results: We found broad support for research about people with intellectual disability, though slightly more tempered support for their direct participation therein. In general, IRB members and to some extent adults with intellectual disability endorsed direct participation less than others. We also found that adults with intellectual disability strongly believed in their consent capacity. Conclusions: Resources should be directed toward health-related research with adults with intellectual disability, and interventions should be pursued to address ethical challenges and promote beliefs consistent with human rights.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Intellectual disability, Research ethics, Research participation",
author = "McDonald, {Katherine E} and Conroy, {Nicole E.} and Olick, {Robert S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Disability and Health Journal",
issn = "1936-6574",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability

T2 - Do stakeholders agree?

AU - McDonald, Katherine E

AU - Conroy, Nicole E.

AU - Olick, Robert S.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability inform research policy and practice, impact interest in and support for research participation, and promote or discourage the generation of new knowledge to promote health among adults with intellectual disability. Yet we know little about these beliefs among the public and the scientific community. Objective/Hypothesis: We quantitatively studied attitudes among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) members. We predicted that adults with intellectual disability, and researchers would espouse views most consistent with disability rights, whereas IRB members, and to a lesser degree family, friends, and service providers, would espouse more protective views. Methods: We surveyed five hundred and twelve members of the five participant stakeholder groups on their attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. Results: We found broad support for research about people with intellectual disability, though slightly more tempered support for their direct participation therein. In general, IRB members and to some extent adults with intellectual disability endorsed direct participation less than others. We also found that adults with intellectual disability strongly believed in their consent capacity. Conclusions: Resources should be directed toward health-related research with adults with intellectual disability, and interventions should be pursued to address ethical challenges and promote beliefs consistent with human rights.

AB - Background: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability inform research policy and practice, impact interest in and support for research participation, and promote or discourage the generation of new knowledge to promote health among adults with intellectual disability. Yet we know little about these beliefs among the public and the scientific community. Objective/Hypothesis: We quantitatively studied attitudes among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) members. We predicted that adults with intellectual disability, and researchers would espouse views most consistent with disability rights, whereas IRB members, and to a lesser degree family, friends, and service providers, would espouse more protective views. Methods: We surveyed five hundred and twelve members of the five participant stakeholder groups on their attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. Results: We found broad support for research about people with intellectual disability, though slightly more tempered support for their direct participation therein. In general, IRB members and to some extent adults with intellectual disability endorsed direct participation less than others. We also found that adults with intellectual disability strongly believed in their consent capacity. Conclusions: Resources should be directed toward health-related research with adults with intellectual disability, and interventions should be pursued to address ethical challenges and promote beliefs consistent with human rights.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Intellectual disability

KW - Research ethics

KW - Research participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039557562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039557562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004

M3 - Article

JO - Disability and Health Journal

JF - Disability and Health Journal

SN - 1936-6574

ER -