A Preliminary Quantitative Comparison of Vibratory Amplitude Using Rigid and Flexible Stroboscopic Assessment

Carly J. Hosbach-Cannon, Soren Lowell, Richard T. Kelley, Raymond H. Colton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish preliminary, quantitative data on amplitude of vibration during stroboscopic assessment in healthy speakers with normal voice characteristics. Amplitude of vocal fold vibration is a core physiological parameter used in diagnosing voice disorders, yet quantitative data are lacking to guide the determination of what constitutes normal vibratory amplitude. Methods/Study Design: Eleven participants were assessed during sustained vowel production using rigid and flexible endoscopy with stroboscopy. Still images were extracted from digital recordings of a sustained /i/ produced at a comfortable pitch and loudness, with F 0 controlled so that levels were within ±15% of each participant's comfortable mean level as determined from connected speech. Glottal width (GW), true vocal fold (TVF) length, and TVF width were measured from still frames representing the maximum open phase of the vibratory cycle. To control for anatomic and magnification differences across participants, GW was normalized to TVF length. GW as a ratio of TVF width was also computed for comparison with prior studies. Results: Mean values and standard deviations were computed for the normalized measures. Paired t tests showed no significant differences between rigid and flexible endoscopy methods. Interrater and intrarater reliability values for raw measurements were found to be high (0.89-0.99). Conclusions: These preliminary quantitative data may be helpful in determining normality or abnormality of vocal fold vibration. Results indicatethat quantified amplitude of vibration is similar between endoscopic methods, a clinically relevant finding for individuals performing and interpreting stroboscopic assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Voice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Vocal Cords
Vibration
Endoscopy
Stroboscopy
Voice Disorders

Keywords

  • Amplitude
  • Flexible stroboscopy
  • Rigid stroboscopy
  • Stroboscopy
  • Vibratory amplitude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

A Preliminary Quantitative Comparison of Vibratory Amplitude Using Rigid and Flexible Stroboscopic Assessment. / Hosbach-Cannon, Carly J.; Lowell, Soren; Kelley, Richard T.; Colton, Raymond H.

In: Journal of Voice, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9039ce35479463ab06d01d573e060dd,
title = "A Preliminary Quantitative Comparison of Vibratory Amplitude Using Rigid and Flexible Stroboscopic Assessment",
abstract = "Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish preliminary, quantitative data on amplitude of vibration during stroboscopic assessment in healthy speakers with normal voice characteristics. Amplitude of vocal fold vibration is a core physiological parameter used in diagnosing voice disorders, yet quantitative data are lacking to guide the determination of what constitutes normal vibratory amplitude. Methods/Study Design: Eleven participants were assessed during sustained vowel production using rigid and flexible endoscopy with stroboscopy. Still images were extracted from digital recordings of a sustained /i/ produced at a comfortable pitch and loudness, with F 0 controlled so that levels were within ±15{\%} of each participant's comfortable mean level as determined from connected speech. Glottal width (GW), true vocal fold (TVF) length, and TVF width were measured from still frames representing the maximum open phase of the vibratory cycle. To control for anatomic and magnification differences across participants, GW was normalized to TVF length. GW as a ratio of TVF width was also computed for comparison with prior studies. Results: Mean values and standard deviations were computed for the normalized measures. Paired t tests showed no significant differences between rigid and flexible endoscopy methods. Interrater and intrarater reliability values for raw measurements were found to be high (0.89-0.99). Conclusions: These preliminary quantitative data may be helpful in determining normality or abnormality of vocal fold vibration. Results indicatethat quantified amplitude of vibration is similar between endoscopic methods, a clinically relevant finding for individuals performing and interpreting stroboscopic assessments.",
keywords = "Amplitude, Flexible stroboscopy, Rigid stroboscopy, Stroboscopy, Vibratory amplitude",
author = "Hosbach-Cannon, {Carly J.} and Soren Lowell and Kelley, {Richard T.} and Colton, {Raymond H.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.018",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Voice",
issn = "0892-1997",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Preliminary Quantitative Comparison of Vibratory Amplitude Using Rigid and Flexible Stroboscopic Assessment

AU - Hosbach-Cannon, Carly J.

AU - Lowell, Soren

AU - Kelley, Richard T.

AU - Colton, Raymond H.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish preliminary, quantitative data on amplitude of vibration during stroboscopic assessment in healthy speakers with normal voice characteristics. Amplitude of vocal fold vibration is a core physiological parameter used in diagnosing voice disorders, yet quantitative data are lacking to guide the determination of what constitutes normal vibratory amplitude. Methods/Study Design: Eleven participants were assessed during sustained vowel production using rigid and flexible endoscopy with stroboscopy. Still images were extracted from digital recordings of a sustained /i/ produced at a comfortable pitch and loudness, with F 0 controlled so that levels were within ±15% of each participant's comfortable mean level as determined from connected speech. Glottal width (GW), true vocal fold (TVF) length, and TVF width were measured from still frames representing the maximum open phase of the vibratory cycle. To control for anatomic and magnification differences across participants, GW was normalized to TVF length. GW as a ratio of TVF width was also computed for comparison with prior studies. Results: Mean values and standard deviations were computed for the normalized measures. Paired t tests showed no significant differences between rigid and flexible endoscopy methods. Interrater and intrarater reliability values for raw measurements were found to be high (0.89-0.99). Conclusions: These preliminary quantitative data may be helpful in determining normality or abnormality of vocal fold vibration. Results indicatethat quantified amplitude of vibration is similar between endoscopic methods, a clinically relevant finding for individuals performing and interpreting stroboscopic assessments.

AB - Study Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish preliminary, quantitative data on amplitude of vibration during stroboscopic assessment in healthy speakers with normal voice characteristics. Amplitude of vocal fold vibration is a core physiological parameter used in diagnosing voice disorders, yet quantitative data are lacking to guide the determination of what constitutes normal vibratory amplitude. Methods/Study Design: Eleven participants were assessed during sustained vowel production using rigid and flexible endoscopy with stroboscopy. Still images were extracted from digital recordings of a sustained /i/ produced at a comfortable pitch and loudness, with F 0 controlled so that levels were within ±15% of each participant's comfortable mean level as determined from connected speech. Glottal width (GW), true vocal fold (TVF) length, and TVF width were measured from still frames representing the maximum open phase of the vibratory cycle. To control for anatomic and magnification differences across participants, GW was normalized to TVF length. GW as a ratio of TVF width was also computed for comparison with prior studies. Results: Mean values and standard deviations were computed for the normalized measures. Paired t tests showed no significant differences between rigid and flexible endoscopy methods. Interrater and intrarater reliability values for raw measurements were found to be high (0.89-0.99). Conclusions: These preliminary quantitative data may be helpful in determining normality or abnormality of vocal fold vibration. Results indicatethat quantified amplitude of vibration is similar between endoscopic methods, a clinically relevant finding for individuals performing and interpreting stroboscopic assessments.

KW - Amplitude

KW - Flexible stroboscopy

KW - Rigid stroboscopy

KW - Stroboscopy

KW - Vibratory amplitude

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936970835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936970835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 26149662

AN - SCOPUS:84936970835

JO - Journal of Voice

JF - Journal of Voice

SN - 0892-1997

ER -