TY - JOUR
T1 - A moral solution to the moral hazard problem
AU - Stevens, Douglas E.
AU - Thevaranjan, Alex
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded through a grant from the research fund of Syracuse University’s Whitman School of Management. The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Anwer Ahmed, Amiya Basu, Joel Demski, Harry Evans, John Fellingham, Gerry Feltham, Paul Fischer, Frank Gigler, David Harris, Steve Huddart, Mark Isaac, Chandra Kanodia, Haijin Lin, Don Moser, Barry Mitnick, Eric Noreen, Tim Salmon, Brian Shapiro, Mary Stanford, Paul Williams, Rick Young and workshop participants at the University of British Columbia, University of Florida, Florida State University, University of Minnesota, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, Syracuse University, SUNY Buffalo, University of Washington and the AAA 12th Annual Ethics Research Symposium. This paper has greatly benefited from the insights and editorial guidance of Anthony Hopwood (the editor) and two anonymous reviewers. Finally, we thank our masters and doctoral students for providing valuable feedback and allowing us to confirm the pedagogical usefulness of our model in the classroom.
Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - In agency theory, offering a flat salary contract under unobservable effort creates a moral hazard problem because the agent is motivated to shirk and provide less than a previously agreed-upon level of effort. We examine a moral solution to this moral hazard problem. In particular, we present a principal-agent model where the agent possesses some level of moral sensitivity that causes him disutility if he provides less than the agreed-upon level of effort. We examine the interplay between moral sensitivity and firm productivity in determining the optimal salary contract, and contrast our moral solution with the traditional incentive solution that becomes necessary when moral sensitivity is assumed to be zero. This allows us to highlight the benefits of the agent's moral sensitivity to both the principal and the agent, and thereby, point out the potential cost of ignoring this moral sensitivity. We conclude that adding moral sensitivity increases the descriptive, prescriptive, and pedagogical usefulness of the principal-agent model.
AB - In agency theory, offering a flat salary contract under unobservable effort creates a moral hazard problem because the agent is motivated to shirk and provide less than a previously agreed-upon level of effort. We examine a moral solution to this moral hazard problem. In particular, we present a principal-agent model where the agent possesses some level of moral sensitivity that causes him disutility if he provides less than the agreed-upon level of effort. We examine the interplay between moral sensitivity and firm productivity in determining the optimal salary contract, and contrast our moral solution with the traditional incentive solution that becomes necessary when moral sensitivity is assumed to be zero. This allows us to highlight the benefits of the agent's moral sensitivity to both the principal and the agent, and thereby, point out the potential cost of ignoring this moral sensitivity. We conclude that adding moral sensitivity increases the descriptive, prescriptive, and pedagogical usefulness of the principal-agent model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76049126939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76049126939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.008
DO - 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:76049126939
SN - 0361-3682
VL - 35
SP - 125
EP - 139
JO - Accounting, Organizations and Society
JF - Accounting, Organizations and Society
IS - 1
ER -