Abstract
Lee et al. (2019) provided a comprehensive list of recommendations for modelers that aims at improving the robustness of their results. Drawing from the literature on philosophy of science, the present commentary argues for a broader view of modeling that considers the different roles that they play in our scientific practices. Following Suppes (1966), I propose a model hierarchy and discuss the distinct issues that arise at each of its levels. The benefit of a hierarchy of this kind is that it can aid researchers in better understanding the different challenges that they face.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 160-165 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Computational Brain and Behavior |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2019 |
Keywords
- Cognitive modeling
- Model comparison
- Robustness
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology