TY - JOUR
T1 - A Longitudinal Study Exploring Learning Environment Culture and Subsequent Risk of Burnout Among Resident Physicians Overall and by Gender
AU - Dyrbye, Liselotte N.
AU - West, Colin P.
AU - Herrin, Jeph
AU - Dovidio, John
AU - Cunningham, Brooke
AU - Yeazel, Mark
AU - Lam, Veronica
AU - Onyeador, Ivuoma N.
AU - Wittlin, Natalie M.
AU - Burke, Sara E.
AU - Hayes, Sharonne N.
AU - Phelan, Sean M.
AU - van Ryn, Michelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objective: To explore the relationship between learning environment culture and the subsequent risk of developing burnout in a national sample of residents overall and by gender. Methods: From April 7 to August 2, 2016, and May 26 to August 5, 2017, we surveyed residents in their second (R2) and third (R3) postgraduate year. The survey included a negative interpersonal experiences scale (score range 1 to 7 points, higher being worse) assessing psychological safety and bias, inclusion, respect, and justice; an unfair treatment scale (score range 1 to 5 points, higher being worse), and two items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Individual responses to the R2 and R3 surveys were linked. Results: The R2 survey was completed by 3588 of 4696 (76.4%) residents; 3058 of 3726 (82.1%) residents completed the R3 survey; and 2888 residents completed both surveys. Women reported more negative interpersonal experiences (mean [SD], 3.00 [0.83] vs 2.90 [0.85], P<.001) and unfair treatment (66.5% vs. 58.7%, P<.001) than men at R2. On multivariable analysis, women at R3 were more likely than their male counterparts to have burnout (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.48; P=.03). Both men and women who reported more negative interpersonal experiences at R2 were more likely to have burnout at R3 (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.52; P<.001). The factors contributing to burnout did not vary in effect magnitude by gender. Conclusion: These findings indicate women residents are more likely to have burnout relative to men in the third year of residency. Negative culture predicted subsequent burnout 1 year later among both men and women. Differences in burnout were at least partly due to differing levels of exposure to negative interactions for men versus women rather than a negative interaction having a differential impact on the well-being of men versus women.
AB - Objective: To explore the relationship between learning environment culture and the subsequent risk of developing burnout in a national sample of residents overall and by gender. Methods: From April 7 to August 2, 2016, and May 26 to August 5, 2017, we surveyed residents in their second (R2) and third (R3) postgraduate year. The survey included a negative interpersonal experiences scale (score range 1 to 7 points, higher being worse) assessing psychological safety and bias, inclusion, respect, and justice; an unfair treatment scale (score range 1 to 5 points, higher being worse), and two items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Individual responses to the R2 and R3 surveys were linked. Results: The R2 survey was completed by 3588 of 4696 (76.4%) residents; 3058 of 3726 (82.1%) residents completed the R3 survey; and 2888 residents completed both surveys. Women reported more negative interpersonal experiences (mean [SD], 3.00 [0.83] vs 2.90 [0.85], P<.001) and unfair treatment (66.5% vs. 58.7%, P<.001) than men at R2. On multivariable analysis, women at R3 were more likely than their male counterparts to have burnout (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.48; P=.03). Both men and women who reported more negative interpersonal experiences at R2 were more likely to have burnout at R3 (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.52; P<.001). The factors contributing to burnout did not vary in effect magnitude by gender. Conclusion: These findings indicate women residents are more likely to have burnout relative to men in the third year of residency. Negative culture predicted subsequent burnout 1 year later among both men and women. Differences in burnout were at least partly due to differing levels of exposure to negative interactions for men versus women rather than a negative interaction having a differential impact on the well-being of men versus women.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110202653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110202653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.036
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 34218879
AN - SCOPUS:85110202653
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 96
SP - 2168
EP - 2183
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 8
ER -