TY - JOUR
T1 - A Learning Progression for Elementary Students’ Functional Thinking
AU - Stephens, Ana C.
AU - Fonger, Nicole
AU - Strachota, Susanne
AU - Isler, Isil
AU - Blanton, Maria
AU - Knuth, Eric
AU - Murphy Gardiner, Angela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2017/7/3
Y1 - 2017/7/3
N2 - In this article we advance characterizations of and supports for elementary students’ progress in generalizing and representing functional relationships as part of a comprehensive approach to early algebra. Our learning progressions approach to early algebra research involves the coordination of a curricular framework and progression, an instructional sequence, written assessments, and levels of sophistication describing students’ algebraic thinking. After detailing this approach, we focus on what we have learned about the development of students’ abilities to generalize and represent functional relationships in a grades 3–5 early algebra intervention by sharing the levels of responses we observed in students’ written work over time. We found that the sophistication of students’ responses increased over the course of the intervention from recursive patterning to correspondence and in some cases covariation relationships between variables. Students’ responses at times differed by the particular tasks that were posed. We discuss implications for research and practice.
AB - In this article we advance characterizations of and supports for elementary students’ progress in generalizing and representing functional relationships as part of a comprehensive approach to early algebra. Our learning progressions approach to early algebra research involves the coordination of a curricular framework and progression, an instructional sequence, written assessments, and levels of sophistication describing students’ algebraic thinking. After detailing this approach, we focus on what we have learned about the development of students’ abilities to generalize and represent functional relationships in a grades 3–5 early algebra intervention by sharing the levels of responses we observed in students’ written work over time. We found that the sophistication of students’ responses increased over the course of the intervention from recursive patterning to correspondence and in some cases covariation relationships between variables. Students’ responses at times differed by the particular tasks that were posed. We discuss implications for research and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021802130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021802130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636
DO - 10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021802130
SN - 1098-6065
VL - 19
SP - 143
EP - 166
JO - Mathematical Thinking and Learning
JF - Mathematical Thinking and Learning
IS - 3
ER -